Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Trump Pledges Federal Ban On Trans Women In Sports If Re-Elected


Carolyn Marie

Recommended Posts

48 minutes ago, Ticket For Epic said:

That's the biggest problem with politicians, those that deserve office don't want it and those that are undeserving do.

Incredibly, alarmingly, and depressingly true.

 

Quote

Damnit!  You know, I had REALLY gotten used to that cishet white male privilege. 

I always laugh and shake my head about the whole privilege thing. Since I’m transitioning… way beyond when I wanted to, I’ve lived 42 years of my life as a “white male.”

 

And now here I am transitioning at 42/43. If I had so much privilege as a white male… why would I willingly give it up?

 

The only “privilege” I saw as a white male was the “privilege” to be called every vile name in the book just because of the color of my skin.

 

And I kid you not, the very day I finally came out and began my transition journey, some of those sand voices immediately began calling me “brave” and wishing me luck. Yo which I could only respond with a rather unladylike response…(think the 13 Ukrainians’ response to the Russian warship).

 

Quote

I think the biggest problem we have is that people don't understand or far too often, don't care to understand, that this is not a choice.  They seem to get that if we could snap our fingers and become the opposite sex we would but what they don't seem to get is that if we could snap our fingers and become comfortable with our gender assigned at birth,  WE'D DO THAT TOO!  But we can't, so we transition as an act of self preservation.

I wouldn’t. I’d take that first option every day and twice on Sundays. Perhaps it’s a result of my life as it’s been, but given a wish from a genie, I’d go cisgender female… not so much the other way.

Link to comment
29 minutes ago, Lenneth said:

It’s not even this.  I hate to say this, but legitimate voting is dead.  People just don’t realize it.  

Long dead.

 

Quote

I will still vote until I die,

After the debacle that was 2020, so will I.

 

But it’ll never be for anyone with a “D” by their name.

 

Quote

but gerrymandering, voter suppression, and court packing have rendered the system almost moot.  

 

The court packing is being considered/done by the dems because they don’t like who Trump nominated.

 

Quote

“The things they had in there were crazy. They had things, levels of voting that if you’d ever agreed to it, you’d never have a Republican elected in this country again.”

Oh I don’t know… I think enough shady stuff went on during that election that both sides have dirty hands. 
 

But the dirtiest hands got the presidency. I’m not a “steal” conspiracy theorist… but it was shady enough that Brandon should have led the charge to verify each and every vote was legitimate.

 

He had one chance to quell all the conspiracy nonsense for good. But he chose to ignore it while he and the cackling moron were busy celebrating their “victory.”

Link to comment
17 minutes ago, Jandi said:

It was pretty botched up.  However it was following through on a deal the previous administration had made.

A previous administration once removed. They guaranteed a departure during Obama’s term.

Link to comment
3 minutes ago, Phoenix said:

Then why did he, on camera, and without skipping a beat, say on National TV that Caitlin Jenner could use whatever restroom she wanted in Trump Tower?

 

If he’s such a bigot, why does he have support from every race, orientation and gender identity?

 

What is it that they know that you don’t? Or vice versa?


What he says doesn’t interest me as much as what he does.  He plays the PR game.  Of course he will back Caitlin Jenner.  She supports him and it’s a great thing to bring up in the face of the backlash for decisions like this.  It nets him a shield of sorts against criticism because he made that one statement in a high profile environment about a high profile, public figure.

 

He has support from so many people because there are billions of people on the planet and an estimated 350-something million people in the U.S.  Statistically he would always find support from someone from every imaginable group.  The question we should ask is, what percentage of those sub-groups support him.  A gay man can support him and the assertion he has support from the gay community is accurate.  But if 50 million gay men don’t, he’s not representing them because he sure didn’t win election with that demographic’s political weight.

 

Look at the legislation he championed.  Steven Miller was hard core trying to eject minorities.  His first travel ban was rejected because it was so transparent.  He called African countries “s*** holes” with no evidence to support that statement and when many African countries are actually quite developed and wonderful societies with educated, civically aware people.

 

Miller also drafted the policy for essentially legal kidnapping of children from immigrants trying to cross the border.  And before anyone brings it up, Biden’s not getting a pass here because he could have stamped that out and didn’t.  Different discussion.  Go ahead and argue it was a deterrent for illegal immigration.  It’s also inhumane, ineffective, cruel, and fiscally irresponsible.  Even if the “camps” these separated children were being kept in were actually being run with a modicum of sanitary and educational standards, that alone is a new outlet for federal funds in a time the Republicans, with the walking tanning bed’s backing, were arguing vehemently about the budget and wasteful spending.  Them talking about budget deficits was a joke to begin with after there tax plan was pushed though.  The walking orange peel literally ran away from New York to Florida to escape the tax situation his own plan created!

 

Back on topic though, the camps these minority children were kept in were mostly atrocious.  No education, little more than sheets to use on cement floors to sleep on, no toothpaste, disgusting bathroom facilities, and lack of access to hygiene products both for bathing and feminine biological needs.

 

This man couldn’t tell the difference between a Mexican and a Honduran.  He mocks disabled people.  He insulted John McCain’s service record because he deigned to disagree with someone who dodged service altogether.  I disagree with McCain on virtually everything he stood for, but there is no disputing the man was a hero.

 

What don’t I know that they do?  More than I could begin to comprehend.  There is no way I will ever be privy to the information they had, have, and will gain in the coming days.  I do know what he said and did.  This is also my personal opinion based on my observations, experiences, discussions, reading material, and social exposure.  This is how I see this spoiled narcissist.  At every juncture he consistently takes the route that benefits himself or harms anyone not a cis, white, heterosexual, wealthy, white man.

Link to comment
22 minutes ago, Phoenix said:

But the dirtiest hands got the presidency. I’m not a “steal” conspiracy theorist… but it was shady enough that Brandon should have led the charge to verify each and every vote was legitimate.


No argument there.  Nobody is clean.  But trying to invalidate the results highlights this “alpha male’s” fragile ego.  He couldn’t accept loss.  And the whole deal with the Arizona recount?  That was going on almost 3 quarters of a year after the actual election.  And nothing changed.  Then other stated started adopting that model just to argue when Republicans lose.  If they lose, Democrats rigged the election.  It’s the cry of their people now.  I accept, without question, Democrats are shady.  I could dump on Pelosi for hours.  I think she needs a James Bond style ejection chair.  But I don’t believe they are tearing down the walls of free and fair elections while building an autocracy or oligarchy in their place.

Link to comment
  • Admin

OK, folks, this thread has started to go off the rails.  It began as a report on what the former President said about trans women in sports.  Lets not get into a lengthy discussion about every aspect of his time in office.  That would require dozens of pages and won't get us anywhere.  Please stick to the topic, or it will be locked.

 

Carolyn Marie

Link to comment
9 minutes ago, Carolyn Marie said:

OK, folks, this thread has started to go off the rails.  It began as a report on what the former President said about trans women in sports.  Lets not get into a lengthy discussion about every aspect of his time in office.  That would require dozens of pages and won't get us anywhere.  Please stick to the topic, or it will be locked.

 

Carolyn Marie

 

Apologies.

Link to comment
7 hours ago, Lenneth said:


What he says doesn’t interest me as much as what he does.  He plays the PR game.  Of course he will back Caitlin Jenner.  She supports him and it’s a great thing to bring up in the face of the backlash for decisions like this.  It nets him a shield of sorts against criticism because he made that one statement in a high profile environment about a high profile, public figure.

 

He has support from so many people because there are billions of people on the planet and an estimated 350-something million people in the U.S.  Statistically he would always find support from someone from every imaginable group.  The question we should ask is, what percentage of those sub-groups support him.  A gay man can support him and the assertion he has support from the gay community is accurate.  But if 50 million gay men don’t, he’s not representing them because he sure didn’t win election with that demographic’s political weight.

 

Look at the legislation he championed.  Steven Miller was hard core trying to eject minorities.  His first travel ban was rejected because it was so transparent.  He called African countries “s*** holes” with no evidence to support that statement and when many African countries are actually quite developed and wonderful societies with educated, civically aware people.

 

Miller also drafted the policy for essentially legal kidnapping of children from immigrants trying to cross the border.  And before anyone brings it up, Biden’s not getting a pass here because he could have stamped that out and didn’t.  Different discussion.  Go ahead and argue it was a deterrent for illegal immigration.  It’s also inhumane, ineffective, cruel, and fiscally irresponsible.  Even if the “camps” these separated children were being kept in were actually being run with a modicum of sanitary and educational standards, that alone is a new outlet for federal funds in a time the Republicans, with the walking tanning bed’s backing, were arguing vehemently about the budget and wasteful spending.  Them talking about budget deficits was a joke to begin with after there tax plan was pushed though.  The walking orange peel literally ran away from New York to Florida to escape the tax situation his own plan created!

 

Back on topic though, the camps these minority children were kept in were mostly atrocious.  No education, little more than sheets to use on cement floors to sleep on, no toothpaste, disgusting bathroom facilities, and lack of access to hygiene products both for bathing and feminine biological needs.

 

This man couldn’t tell the difference between a Mexican and a Honduran.  He mocks disabled people.  He insulted John McCain’s service record because he deigned to disagree with someone who dodged service altogether.  I disagree with McCain on virtually everything he stood for, but there is no disputing the man was a hero.

 

What don’t I know that they do?  More than I could begin to comprehend.  There is no way I will ever be privy to the information they had, have, and will gain in the coming days.  I do know what he said and did.  This is also my personal opinion based on my observations, experiences, discussions, reading material, and social exposure.  This is how I see this spoiled narcissist.  At every juncture he consistently takes the route that benefits himself or harms anyone not a cis, white, heterosexual, wealthy, white man.

🙄

Link to comment
  • Who's Online   8 Members, 0 Anonymous, 102 Guests (See full list)

    • MaeBe
    • Abigail Genevieve
    • Ashley0616
    • Ivy
    • Karen Carey
    • LucyF
    • SamC
    • Mmindy
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,029
    • Most Online
      8,356

    Selkimur
    Newest Member
    Selkimur
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Anyatimenow
      Anyatimenow
      (23 years old)
    2. Aria00
      Aria00
    3. Ava B.
      Ava B.
      (24 years old)
    4. Claire Heshi
      Claire Heshi
    5. CrystalMatthews0426
      CrystalMatthews0426
      (41 years old)
  • Posts

    • LucyF
      I've got Spironolactone 100mg and Evorel 50mcg Patches (2 a week) going up to 100mg after 4 weeks 
    • Ivy
      Got a new Granddaughter this morning.  Mother and child (and father) are doing fine. This makes 7 granddaughters and one grandson.  I have 2 sons and 6 daughters myself.  And then I  switched teams.  I think this stuff runs in the family. Another hard day for the patriarchy.
    • Ivy
      Like @MaeBe pointed out, Trump won't do these things personally.  I doubt that he actually gives a rat's a$$ himself.  But he is the foot in the door for the others.   I don't really see this.  Personally, I am all in favor of "traditional" families.  I raised my own kids this way and it can work fine.  But I think we need to allow for other variations as well.   One thing working against this now is how hard it is for a single breadwinner to support a family.  Many people (I know some) would prefer "traditional" if they could actually afford it.  Like I mentioned, we raised our family with this model, but we were always right at the poverty level.   I was a "conservative evangelical" for most of my life, actually.  So I do understand this.  Admittedly, I no longer consider myself one. I have family members still in this camp.  Some tolerate me, one actually rejects me.  I assure you the rejection is on her side, not mine.  But, I understand she believes what she is doing is right - 'sa pity though. I mean no insult toward anyone on this forum.  You're free to disagree with me.  Many people do.   This is a pretty complex one.  Socialism takes many forms, many of which we accept without even realizing it.  "Classism" does exist, for what it's worth.  Always has, probably always will.  But I don't feel like that is a subject for this forum.   As for the election, it's shaping up to be another one of those "hold your nose" deals.
    • Ivy
      Just some exerts regarding subjects of interest to me.
    • Ivy
      Yeah.  In my early teens I trained myself out of a few things that I now wish I hadn't.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I was thinking in particular of BLM, who years ago had a 'What We Believe' section that sounded like they were at war with the nuclear family.   I tried to find it. Nope.  Of interest https://www.politifact.com/article/2020/aug/28/ask-politifact-does-black-lives-matter-aim-destroy/   My time is limited and I will try to answer as I can.
    • Ivy
      Well, I suppose it is possible that they don't actually plan on doing what they say.  I'm not too sure I want to take that chance.  But I kinda expect to find out.  Yet, perhaps you're right and it's all just talk.  And anyway, my state GOP is giving me enough to worry about anyway. I remember a time when being "woke" just meant you were paying attention.  Now it means you are the antichrist. I just don't want the government "protecting" me from my personal "delusions."
    • MaeBe
      1.  I think there are some legitimate concern.   2. Thoroughly discussing this will consume many threads.   3. I disagree partially with @MaeBe but there is partial agreement.   4. The context includes what is happening in society that the authors are observing.  It is not an isolated document.   The observation is through a certain lens, because people do things differently doesn't mean they're doing it wrong. Honestly, a lot of the conservative rhetoric is morphing desires of people to be treated with respect and social equity to be tantamount to the absolution of the family, heterosexuality, etc. Also, being quiet and trying to blend in doesn't change anything. Show me a social change that benefits a minority or marginalized group that didn't need to be loud.   5. Trump, if elected, is as likely to spend his energies going after political opponents as he is to implementing something like this.   Trump will appoint people to do this, like Roger Severino (who was appointed before, who has a record of anti-LGBTQ+ actions), he need not do anything beyond this. His people are ready to push this agenda forward. While the conservative right rails about bureaucracy, they intend to weaponize it. There is no question. They don't want to simplify government, they simply want to fire everyone and bring in conservative "warriors" (their rhetoric). Does America survive 4 year cycles of purge/cronyism?   6. I reject critical theory, which is based on Marxism.  Marxism has never worked and never will.  Critical theory has problems which would need time to go into, which I do not have.   OK, but this seems like every other time CRT comes up with conservatives...completely out of the blue. I think it's reference is mostly just to spark outrage from the base. Definitely food thought for a different thread, though.   7. There are groups who have declared war on the nuclear family as problematically patriarchal, and a lot of other terms. They are easy to find on the internet.  This document is reacting to that (see #4 above).   What is the war on the nuclear family? I searched online and couldn't find much other than reasons why people aren't getting married as much or having kids (that wasn't a propaganda from Heritage or opinions pieces from the right that paint with really broad strokes). Easy things to see: the upward mobility and agency of women, the massive cost of rearing children, general negative attitudes about the future, male insecurity, etc. None of this equates to a war on the nuclear family, but I guess if you look at it as "men should be breadwinners and women must get married for financial support and extend the male family line (and to promote "National Greatness") I could see the decline of marriage as a sign of the collapse of a titled system and, if I was a beneficiary of that system or believe that to NOT be tilted, be aggrieved.   8.  Much of this would have to be legislated, and this is a policy documented.  Implementation would  be most likely different, but that does not mean criticism is unwarranted.   "It might be different if you just give it a chance", unlike all the other legislation that's out there targeting LGBTQ+ from the right, these are going to be different? First it will be trans rights, then it will be gay marriage, and then what? Women's suffrage?   I get it, we may have different compasses, but it's not hard to see that there's no place for queer people in the conservative worldview. There seems to be a consistent insistence that "America was and is no longer Great", as if the 1950s were the pinnacle of society, completely ignoring how great America still is and can continue to be--without having to regress society to the low standards of its patriarchal yesteryears.    
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      Cadillac parts are pretty expensive, so repairing them costs more.  But they don't seem to break down more than other makes.  Lots of Lincoln models use Ford cars as a base, so you can get parts that aren't much more expensive.    My family has had good luck with "Panther platform" cars.  Ford Crown Victoria, Mercury Marquis, Lincoln Towncar or Continental.  4.6 V8 and 5.0 V8.  Reasonable fuel economy, and fairly durable.  Our county sheriff's office was running Chargers and SUV's for a while, but has gone back to older Crown Victorias for ease of maintenance.  GF rebuilds them here.  But they are getting more scarce, since the newest ones were made in 2011.    1992-1997 years were different than the later years.  1998-2001 they did some changes, and apparently the best years are 2003 to 2011.  Check Craigslist, and also government auctions.  GF has gotten a lot of them at auction, and they can be had in rough-but-running shape for around $1,000.  Ones in great shape can be found in the $5,000+ range.  Good for 200,000 miles without significant rebuilding.  Go through engine and transmission and electrical systems, and they go half a million.    Some Chrysler models are OK.  The 300 mostly has the same engines as the Charger and Challenger, so parts availability is pretty good.  But they tend to get timing issues.  The older Chrysler Sebring convertibles were pretty reliable, sometimes going 200,000 miles without tons of problems, although after that they were pretty much worn out. 
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I think I have read everything the Southern Baptists have to say on transgender, and it helped convince me they are dead wrong on these issues.  They can be nice people.  I would never join an SBC church.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      You come across as a thoughtful, sweet, interesting and pleasant person.    There are parts of this country, and more so the world, where evangelicals experience a great deal of finger wagging.
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      It has been an interesting experience being in a marriage in a Christian faith community, yet being intersex/trans.  I stay pretty quiet, and most have kind of accepted that I'm just the strange, harmless exception.  "Oh, that's just Jen.  Jen is...different."  I define success as being a person most folks just overlook. 
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      Well, I live in an area with a lot of Southern Baptists, Evangelicals, etc...  We've experienced our share of finger-wagging, as the "standard interpretation" of Scripture in the USA is that the Bible only approves of "one man, one woman" marriage.  My faith community is mostly accepted here, but that has taken time and effort.  It can be tough at times to continue to engage with culture and the broader population, and avoid the temptation to huddle up behind walls like a cult.    Tolerance only goes so far.  At one point, my husband was asked to run for sheriff.  He declined, partly because an elected official with four wives would have a REALLY tough time.  (Of course, making way less than his current salary wasn't an option either). 
    • Abigail Genevieve
      My bone structure is far more female than male.  I can't throw like a guy, which has been observed by guys numerous times, and moving like a woman is more natural.  It just is.  I'm not going out of my way to act in a fem. way, as you say, but I am letting go of some of the 'I am not going to move like that because I am a guy' stuff I have defensively developed.  The other breaks through anyway - there were numerous looks from people at work when I would use gestures that are forbidden to men, or say something spontaneously no guy would ever say.   At one point, maybe a year or more ago, I said it was unfair for people to think they were dealing with a man when they were actually dealing with a woman.    Girl here.  'What is a woman' is a topic for another day.
    • Willow
      Mom, I’m home!  What’s for lunch?   Leftover pizza .   ok.    Not exactly our conversation but there is truth in the answer.     @KymmieLsorry you are sick. Feel better soon.   Girl mode, boy mode no mode, not us. Nothing functional for either of us.   anyone here have or had a 10 year old (plus or minus) Caddy, Lincoln or Chrysler?  How was it?  Lots of repairs?  Comfortable seats? Anything positive or negative about it?  I need to replace my 2004 Ford Explorer Eddie Bauer, it’s eating $100 dollar bills and needs a couple of thousand dollars worth of work and that doesn’t even fix the check engine code.  Obviously, it isn’t worth putting that kind of money into a 20 year old car with a 174 thousand miles.   Willow
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...