Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

You Need to Know About Project 2025


emeraldmountain2

Recommended Posts

On 12/13/2023 at 9:34 AM, emeraldmountain2 said:

@Britney Summers

 

I respect your right to your opinions, but I'm sorry, I disagree. The United States has a brutal, centuries-long history of racism including slavery, people of color still face racism and the effects thereof, and I don't see why a fear of the ramp up of racist persecution is hyperbole.

No one alive  is responsible for things that happened centuries ago!  No one alive is a slave owner! 

The problem now a days is actual reverse racism, known as anti-whiteism.  I see reports of it coming from colleges, employers, etc.  Even movies that have anti-whiteism in them.   If you say you disagree, you aren't paying attention! That is on YOU.

Link to comment
  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • emeraldmountain2

    13

  • Britney Summers

    10

  • Ivy

    6

  • MaeBe

    6

5 minutes ago, Britney Summers said:

No one alive  is responsible for things that happened centuries ago!  No one alive is a slave owner! 

The problem now a days is actual reverse racism, known as anti-whiteism.  I see reports of it coming from colleges, employers, etc.  Even movies that have anti-whiteism in them.   If you say you disagree, you aren't paying attention! That is on YOU.

Are you being for real right now lol

Link to comment
5 minutes ago, Britney Summers said:

No one alive  is responsible for things that happened centuries ago!  No one alive is a slave owner! 

The problem now a days is actual reverse racism, known as anti-whiteism.  I see reports of it coming from colleges, employers, etc.  Even movies that have anti-whiteism in them.   If you say you disagree, you aren't paying attention! That is on YOU.

"Reverse-racism", "anti-white sentiment", the "Great Replacement" or any other name for it are pure racist tripe used to manipulate people with fear and misinformation. Wanting people to have equality by identifying the systems that keep them from that equality isn't "reverse racism". Because people aren't literally enslaved in this country right now doesn't mean that everything's "better now". Outreach is better than divisiveness, so if you are interested in challenging your existing bias I'd be happy to share some information with on why what you've learned just isn't correct.

Link to comment

Who said anyone alive is responsible for slavery in the 1800's and before? I certainly did not. Although, since you mentioned it, there is still slavery and human trafficking going on around the world, including the US, and including trans people (look it up).

 

The negative effects of slavery and racism are still something that Black people are oppressed by (look it up).

 

I pay very close attention to these matters and I think you need to do some more learning.

Link to comment
On 12/13/2023 at 9:09 AM, Britney Summers said:

The part I highlighted in bold font is hyperbolic.  

 

----------

The best way to prevent this is urging our reps to pass the equality act. As its highly likely trump will be back because of the lack of self awareness of democrats, and democrat assets in the media.  Hyperbolic claims aren't going to stop trump.

----------

Want to stop trump? Here is how to do it. 

Forget about climate change, it is a made up problem by the rich for the rich.  The rich fly on their private jets and lecture us, and the world about an imaginary foot print. Fear sells really well. 

Climate change is some thing they don't like being questioned!  That is a major red flag when you can't question some thing.  Often times they pull the "conspiracy theory ( theorist )" card to shut down questioning.

 

Stop censoring your opposition, violating the first amendment repeatedly,  you aren't going to be told this is happening on government approved media sources.  

 

Stop politically persecuting the opposition over political disagreements, as it open the door for them to do the same.

 

Stop tearing down the border wall and Secure the borders, deport all that are illegally here.

 

Stop violating constitutional rights.

 

Dump the toxic political correctness and wokeness, it doesn't help your cause.  

 

Require establishment approved media sources to fairly report on both sides, no more media blackouts on the truth, facts.  The two party system would fall, and independents would likely win.

 

Term limits!  No more career politicians.  

 

Definitely agree. 

 

Where I live, what opposition there is towards transgender people is mostly due to the perceived link between them and the social agendas that big government loves. And when Trump is one of the very few to criticize big government openly, it's no surprise that he is popular. What I dislike is that the Republicans start with very valid criticism of big government and the Democrat Party and Socialism or leftism, but they just use it as a talking point and a tool. What have they spent their time talking about the last few years? Bathrooms and school sports. Not the economy, or inflation, or the climate change agenda, or crime or our borders or really anything else that's relevant to our lives.

Link to comment
On 12/13/2023 at 9:43 AM, emeraldmountain2 said:

Also, climate change is very, very real. Even some Republicans admit it. The fossil fuel industry has literally known about it for many decades with their own research, but promoted misinformation about climate change. (see article https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/exxon-knew-about-climate-change-almost-40-years-ago/).

 

You can literally see the effects of climate change by going outdoors and listening to the news of habitat loss, species extinction, wildfires, etc.

Climate policies are anti-human, anti-freedom, anti-pets too.  They hurt the poor the most due to increased energy, pump prices, raising costs of goods, as well as pump prices .  Obiden admits that.   https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidblackmon/2022/05/24/biden-says-the-quiet-part-about-the-energy-transition-out-loud/?sh=120a2c245306

 

 

 

Will you eat bugs to save the C-lie-mate? https://www.foxnews.com/media/utah-school-gives-kids-insects-eat-class-climate-change-assignment-says-will-save-planet

 

What climate cultists are planning https://www.latimes.com/environment/newsletter/2023-07-20/would-an-occasional-blackout-help-solve-climate-change-boiling-point

 

Explain how making every thing cost more makes the climate be gooder? 

I ask again,  why can't climate $cience be questioned? Questioning science is how you do science. 

 

I strongly suggest you start questioning the climate narrative they are selling you. 

Maybe a climate emergency would help people see what they have planned, it won't be happy fun time like the china virus lock downs!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
12 minutes ago, awkward-yet-sweet said:

Definitely agree. 

 

Where I live, what opposition there is towards transgender people is mostly due to the perceived link between them and the social agendas that big government loves. And when Trump is one of the very few to criticize big government openly, it's no surprise that he is popular. What I dislike is that the Republicans start with very valid criticism of big government and the Democrat Party and Socialism or leftism, but they just use it as a talking point and a tool. What have they spent their time talking about the last few years? Bathrooms and school sports. Not the economy, or inflation, or the climate change agenda, or crime or our borders or really anything else that's relevant to our lives.

I am in full agreement with you.  They need to get off the trans stuff, as it is not even close to as big of a deal they make it out to be.  I can count on one hand the bathroom problem claims, and still have a few fingers left over.

Both sides are the same, just in different ways.

Link to comment
4 minutes ago, Britney Summers said:

I am in full agreement with you.  They need to get off the trans stuff, as it is not even close to as big of a deal they make it out to be.  I can count on one hand the bathroom problem claims, and still have a few fingers left over.

Both sides are the same, just in different ways.

what are you talking about even, all of the bills and laws that seek to erase us from the public sphere, to take away our health care, to literally make it legal to murder us if you are "frightened" of us are being put forward by one party there is no "both sides"ing this 

Link to comment
1 hour ago, MaeBe said:

"Reverse-racism", "anti-white sentiment", the "Great Replacement" or any other name for it are pure racist tripe used to manipulate people with fear and misinformation. Wanting people to have equality by identifying the systems that keep them from that equality isn't "reverse racism". Because people aren't literally enslaved in this country right now doesn't mean that everything's "better now". Outreach is better than divisiveness, so if you are interested in challenging your existing bias I'd be happy to share some information with on why what you've learned just isn't correct.

That is incorrect.  Every thing you said is wrong.  You are lacking information.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/evangerstmann/2021/06/12/yet-another-federal-court-tells-biden-that-he-cant-exclude-whites-from-his-relief-programs/?sh=10f8f5185e1f

 

https://www.cnn.com/2021/10/28/us/novant-health-wrongful-termination-white-executive-fired/index.html

 

Oh wait whats this? https://reason.com/volokh/2021/12/16/i-despise-white-people-lawsuit-against-osu-can-go-forward/

 

Oh looky here, starbucks this time https://www.npr.org/2023/06/15/1182359923/ex-starbucks-manager-awarded-25-6-million-in-case-tied-to-arrests-of-2-black-men

 

There is plenty more anti-white discrimination/reverse racism going on out there.  Your ignorance doesn't make me wrong. 

Link to comment
25 minutes ago, Britney Summers said:

 

I'm thinking the racial issues are bit tangential to this thread's topic. 

 

Although I don't disagree on the points you make, I'd be hesitant to use stuff from establishment mouthpieces like CNN and NPR.  

Link to comment
2 hours ago, Britney Summers said:

Explain how making every thing cost more makes the climate be gooder? 

I do not need to explain anything to you. I have said what I will say as of now. Good luck!

Link to comment
On 12/13/2023 at 10:09 AM, Britney Summers said:

Forget about climate change, it is a made up problem by the rich for the rich.  The rich fly on their private jets and lecture us, and the world about an imaginary foot print.

I don't think climate change is made up.  However the "rich" are able to insulate themselves from the effects, and so largely don't really give a [fill in the blank].

 

The burden of addressing climate issues should not be on the "less wealthy" while the incredibly wealthy continue to do as they please.  A private jet makes a bit more pollution than a single mother driving across town to her crap job.

 

I don't think merely acquiescing to the right-wing agenda would win trans-folks acceptance.  To them we the problem itself.  But I don't see how our eradication would solve any real problems.  All this culture war crap just distracts people from realizing how they are being used.

 

 

Link to comment
2 hours ago, Britney Summers said:

Your ignorance doesn't make me wrong. 

Your cherry picking of information and stating it as a full blown agenda on the scale of the repression of other ethnicities doesn’t make you right. I can only assume, with your brash rhetoric, that you feel discriminated against based on race and I’m sorry you do. The whole concept of reverse racism is to try to minimize or undermine the struggle others have and continue to deal with. 

Link to comment
  • Root Admin

OK folks, calm down. It's ok to disagree but keep your replies respectful. We don't allow flame wars here

 

6  The following behavior is strictly forbidden everywhere on the site: flame wars, trolling, deliberately provoking arguments, intentionally insulting others or yourself.

Link to comment
3 minutes ago, MaryEllen said:

The following behavior is strictly forbidden everywhere on the site: ...  intentionally insulting others or yourself. (Emphasis added by me, Timi)

Thank you for having this rule. 

 

This place is a haven for me. 

 

I did not realize it until I joined ... wow .. just a couple of weeks ago. 

 

I had never ever met anyone who had life experiences like I have had until here. 

 

And now ... so many! Every day, there's someone new popping in, sharing their story. Being vulnerable in this most sacred of spaces. 

 

Here - I do not ... no, I cannot do what I have done my whole life: insult myself. 

 

Here, I can feel dignity. 

 

That's where I want my passion to be in this space. To passionately help co-create that safe space for other Transgendered Beings. 

 

Thank you. 

 

-Timi

Link to comment

And I do apologize if I got a bit carried away myself.  

I doubt that many of us here are flying around in private jets.  LOL.

Link to comment
20 hours ago, MaeBe said:

Your cherry picking of information and stating it as a full blown agenda on the scale of the repression of other ethnicities doesn’t make you right. I can only assume, with your brash rhetoric, that you feel discriminated against based on race and I’m sorry you do. The whole concept of reverse racism is to try to minimize or undermine the struggle others have and continue to deal with. 

Nothing was cherry picked.  There is much more then that out there. The fact you aren't bothered by reverse racism, is troubling.    IBM is in trouble for discriminatory hiring practices now too!  https://www.bizpacreview.com/2023/12/12/ibm-chief-caught-coercing-managers-to-use-discriminatory-practices-in-hiring-process-leaked-video-shows-1419449/

 

Oppressing other races to lift others is wrong.  Discriminatory hiring practices based on race is wrong too, same with gender.  The divide and conquer agenda has sadly worked.  Divided we fall, united we stand.

 

 

Link to comment
22 hours ago, emeraldmountain2 said:

I do not need to explain anything to you. I have said what I will say as of now. Good luck!

Its ok to not explain any thing, as climate change is the biggest perpetual scam on most of the world.  

Ask yourself what country benefits from climate change agenda, and controls almost all the resources?  Follow the money.  Good luck, to you.

Link to comment

Back on track, yes Project 2025 has some problematic, and some scary things, I do like that federal efficiency standards would go away.  Forcing efficiency makes things break down more because of unnecessary electronics, and raising the cost of the product on top of it.  

 

Link to comment
2 minutes ago, Britney Summers said:

Back on track, yes Project 2025 has some problematic, and some scary things, I do like that federal efficiency standards would go away.  Forcing efficiency makes things break down more because of unnecessary electronics, and raising the cost of the product on top of it.  

 

I definitely agree on that part. Although I would prefer to just get rid of the EPA entirely. You wouldn't believe the modifications people have to do to vehicles and farm equipment of more recent models.  Plenty of examples of brand new equipment that simply won't run. The prices of old farm equipment are crazy high because the supply is limited and people want the stuff that the government hasn't ruined.

Link to comment

Yeah, dealing with climate change is inconvenient.  Denying it won't make it go away.

I'm becoming convinced that the human race is suicidal.

Link to comment

How did this thread go from expressing worry over an anti-trans agenda to debating the existence of climate change? I'm stuck between laughing and making a shocked face-

Link to comment
5 minutes ago, RaineOnYourParade said:

How did this thread go from expressing worry over an anti-trans agenda to debating the existence of climate change? I'm stuck between laughing and making a shocked face-

Seriously.

Link to comment

I'll just leave this here as food for thought for you wonderful folks out there. How conversations get hijacked:

 

SWAMPED:

 

S: Strawmen: Attack views or ideas, never expressed by the target.

W: Whataboutism: Deflect the discussion away from the subject.

A: Attack: Use brutal language to discourage the opposition.

M: Mockery: Use sarcasm to belittle the opposition.

P: Provocations: A false flag operations

E: Exhaust: Drown the opposition in details and technicalities

😧 Denial: Flatly deny any evidence

Link to comment
  • Carolyn Marie locked this topic
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Who's Online   7 Members, 0 Anonymous, 125 Guests (See full list)

    • Susie
    • Abigail Genevieve
    • SamC
    • MaybeRob
    • MaeBe
    • EffieL
    • Thea
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.6k
    • Total Posts
      767.3k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,988
    • Most Online
      8,356

    Stefani pratt
    Newest Member
    Stefani pratt
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Alliana
      Alliana
      (58 years old)
    2. Asayoru-343
      Asayoru-343
      (18 years old)
    3. dhowell
      dhowell
      (69 years old)
    4. Swan13
      Swan13
  • Posts

    • MaeBe
      Lest I need state it, I understand there are churches/congregations/sects that are very LGBTQ+ welcoming. They are a beautiful minority.   On the whole you will find more xtian/xtian-adjacent religions against LGBTQ+ people than those that support them. Perhaps in 300 years it will be different, but for now where are the voices coming from that most vehemently eschew queer people? I ask that simple question. If my answer of mostly religious-based persons is wrong, I am happy to stand corrected.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I read through those SBC documents, the Nashville Statement and some other stuff and I am sitting here frustrated with the situation, not guilty feeling but irritated at how they missed some logical connections because of their preconceptions and I seriously doubt they talked to a biologist, a geneticist or a specialist in sexual disorders before writing this stuff.   I've never been SBC and never plan to be.  Nonetheless there is a sense of yuck I have to deal with.  They are conservative evangelicals and likely have never met an articulate transgender person in their lives, one they can dialog with, because, for one thing, according to the Nashville Statement, they will shut down dialog and tell the transgender person how they are wrong.  No listening.  Just telling. 
    • MaeBe
      And we're no longer primitive. We're not longer fighting for the survival of the species, in fact we're killing the planet with our virility. You can claim old habits die hard, but it's not for primitive clashes of clans (almost wrote clashes of clams, that's a completely different thing!) that these mentalities persist. Who is responsible for maintaining ancient culture in the name of tradition? Perhaps my argument is a semantic one, but who are the people most insistent in perpetuating the past? Religious bodies and those that support them are.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      The only memory I can drudge up about a flippant attitude was some school kid who said he switched genders on a whim and never could decide on Monday what he would be Tuesday.  This was an online article a ways back.  For all I know the author of the article exaggerated.  Or misunderstood.   Trying to locate the cause of this idea that transgender people have a flippant attitude, which nyet, about TG, especially in the light of the immense soul-struggle so many go through on so many levels.   They may say they love someone, but you are right, what happens in the actuality is what counts and 'loving church discipline' can be cold and cruel.  Personally I am not going to risk it. If I found myself at an SBC church even for one meeting I would carefully avoid any hint that I am TG.  They might feel obligated to deliver my filthy soul from Satan and not believe it when I said I already invited Jesus in my heart and I seek to obey Him.  I have been through things like that at times on other issues.   Our denomination has a position paper on transgender I can live with, and we really like our church and are plugged in and comfortable.  I pointed out to our pastor that, percentage wise, we in all likelihood have some stealth transgender among us.  He did not reply, and he did not reply in a manner that makes me think he knows of some in our church, people who have told him they are and he is keeping the confidence.  Several times he has alluded to transgender people without condemnation.  It's a good place. We struggle with the issue of dealing with transgender youth coming to youth events, I have heard second hand.  But they are welcome and they come.  Issues like where do they sleep at night get wrestled with. Not banning them.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Listen to John MacArthur on trans* sometimes - Christians sometimes do.  I could easily point to others.    I'm not sure religion is the underlying cause.  In a primitive tribe, a man does not want to go to war because he is a woman? They are down a warrior. A woman claims to be a man and does not want to build the tribe up by giving birth? Both of these things are primitively treason against the tribe. 
    • Mmindy
      @Abigail GenevieveI was raised on St. Louis Cardinals Baseball & Blues Hockey. I’m old enough to have been a Cards Football fan too, but Bill Bidwell changed that when he moved the team to Arizona. 
    • MaeBe
      Honestly, I wasn't talking about religious stances on trans people when I wrote that. That said, religion fosters transphobia in subtle and awful ways. Such as your reference for the SBC, it's a sin. Why? Because they interpret scripture in a way to exclude trans people from the capability of being saved? Where do you think transphobia really stems from? It is 100% rooted in religion. Even those that aren't religious are influenced by religion, society as a whole has been. I think handwaving their position as simply "honoring tradition" or "interpreting sin" as not being transphobic is allowing their doublespeak to cloud judgement. If they truly loved, respected, understood, and embraced humanity people they wouldn't exclude trans people. They would go to the parts of the bible that talk about loving everyone as they are God's creations and just letting God sort it out in the end, but no: if you're not cis/het, you're not welcome and shame on you [selected slur]!   On the flip side, I draw parallels to how religion behaves exactly as xstian nationalists insist LGBTQ+ people are grooming youths. The main way to make more xtians is to breed and indoctrinate the young. Trans people aren't forcing their young to be trans or guilting them to no end if they're not or traveling the world as missionaries to spread transness!   Anyway, I am flying too close to the Sun here. I have no qualms if people find solace, grace, or peace in faith or religion, but I am wary of the idea that religion doesn't propagate transphobia.  
    • Betty K
      I’m glad to hear you mean no harm and have no beef with genderfluid folks. Thank you for clarifying that. This still seems a strange presumption to me though, when so much of anti-trans propaganda is clearly either (a) concocted in bad faith to justify an argument, or (b) based on ignorant assumptions. Yes it’s possible a few outliers in the trans community are making ridiculous claims about this topic, but even if so I seriously doubt they are the cause of the relevant anti-trans propaganda.    That may well be a fair call, and you’re right that “transphobe” is an over-generalisation. I used it as a shorthand and because, as Sally and MaeBe said, there is always a transphobic minority that spreads the anti-trans views which then unfortunately influence some who are less transphobic. But I still think we can fairly characterise such beliefs as being transphobic, at least partly. As to the absence of hatred in those church documents, you may be right about that, but I would be wary of taking people or institutions at face value when they urge love and compassion. Even the most virulent transphobes sometimes claim to support trans people. Actions speak louder than words.    I do better understand your anguish over lack of belief in trans identities now though. It must be very difficult being trans and involved with certain churches. I know there are some churches that accept and affirm trans folks though; maybe it’s time for a change in denomination?
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I looked through the Focus on the Family material and also the Southern Baptist Convention stuff, both highly influential, both rejecting transgenderism.  I found no hatred but an urge to treat people with love and compassion. I found some logical fallacies in both and nothing convinced me to change my position.  SBC assumes someone who is transgender is not saved and so is not allowed to join their congregations.    I have a certain affection for both.  FotF helped us with some material that helped us raise our kids and on most issues they are fellow travelers.  SBC seeks to conscientiously fight the good fight but I would never join a SBC church for reasons that are irrelevant here.  Not that I could now in good conscience.  I look like a guy? SURPRISE!  Left boot of fellowship.   The Nashville Statement is worse.  CBMW.org wrote it and it has been criticized heavily by some trans folk. . https://cbmw.org/nashville-statement#articles  I am saddened at some of who signed the thing. Articles 10 and 13 are of particular interest.  Other things can be found here that trans folk would take exception to. But they do not treat TG as something flippant.    I would not refer to any of these as transphobes.  I am not sure the term is useful in conceptualizing or interacting with those who object to the idea of transgender being something besides sin.  When all you have is a hammer, everything is a nail.    
    • Maddee
      Happy to see the rainbows again🌈🌈
    • Ashley0616
    • Vidanjali
      Nice to see you, dear and congratulations on your upcoming anniversary. Very well done!
    • Vidanjali
      It's estimated between 1-2% of the general population is transgender. This is based on a cursory web search of studies and stats. So apply that to all teachers and students in Florida. According to ballotpedia, in 2022 there was a total of about 3 million public school teachers and students combined. That does not include  higher ed institutions and private institutions. So let's tack on another million people which is a pretty conservative estimate. 1-2% of 4 million is 40,000-80,000 people.
    • Vidanjali
      Both. In the course of experience an individual will naturally go through periods of inquiry and seek to define their experiences for deeper personal insight. This potentially goes on and on, though some have greater curiosity than others.
    • Ashley0616
      Heck I would get rid of the left and right lower rib. I would love a narrower waist but I would still need to get rid of my gut. I guess I'll do liposuction and tummy tuck and while they are at they can remove those ribs. 
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...