Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

South Carolina Bill Would Make Schools Say "It Is False" To Use Trans People's Pronouns


Ivy

Recommended Posts

https://www.erininthemorning.com/p/south-carolina-bill-would-make-schools?utm_source=substack&publication_id=994764&post_id=139927385&utm_medium=email&utm_content=share&utm_campaign=email-share&triggerShare=true&isFreemail=true&r=k5hac

 

More from the party of "freedom."  

They're not content with merely silencing us.  Now they want to weaponize the school curriculum against us.  

 

"A new bill in South Carolina would mandate schools to make it official policy that using a transgender person’s pronouns is “false.” The bill would also mandate that teachers could not go by their preferred pronouns or gendered honorifics if they do not match their assigned sex at birth. Lastly, it would allow parents to more easily remove books from the classroom. When confronted with the effects this legislation would cause,[by] Dr. Michael O’Brien, a pediatrician in the state, the bill’s sponsor, Representative Jordan Pace, responded, telling Dr. O’Brien to “repent.”"

 

These people are trying to out do each other in oppressing trans people.  I mean, it's what God wants./s

Link to comment
  • Admin

Whatever they do, it's seemingly never enough.  IDK if this violates the 1st Amendment, but I'm sure the ACLU will be busy figuring it out. 

 

The R's are just mean.  Who does it hurt to use a preferred pronoun?

 

Carolyn Marie

Link to comment

Here's a bit more, from the UK this time…

 

https://www.erininthemorning.com/p/uk-school-guidance-social-transition?utm_source=substack&publication_id=994764&post_id=139952055&utm_medium=email&utm_content=share&utm_campaign=email-share&triggerShare=true&isFreemail=true&r=k5hac

 

UK School Guidance: Social Transition Bans Are The Next Front In Anti-Trans Laws Globally

 

"On Monday, the United Kingdom's Department for Education released a set of much-feared draft school policies and guidance concerning transgender students. The contents of the release were horrifying for LGBTQ+ activists in the country: “there is no general duty to allow a child to socially transition.” The plan further outlined policies that would forcibly out trans youth to their parents, ban pronouns for all primary school trans youth, prevent trans youth from using restrooms that align with their gender identity, and could even lead to forced haircuts and clothing choices. In the United States, anti-trans activists and organizations lauded the decision, with some stating it did not go far enough. Draft policies and pending legislation indicate that barring trans kids from expressing their gender identities by banning social transition is the next phase in the international effort to eradicate transgender people from public life.

The UK release would allow for schools and colleges to make transition virtually impossible for students. It states that schools have no duty to allow social transition, even if their parents are fully supportive…"

Link to comment

Yeah, with a Republican super majority in SC, the prospects for being transgender in SC are dismal. This is just one of the anti-transgender proposals. It is disheartening to own a home in SC. On one hand I like my house, and I personally get no grief, but there is all of this flack going on. I still shake my head trying to figure out what we did as a group that has made us less popular than Hamas. 

 

Legislation like that in this proposal will hurt SC more than they realize. Professional people will avoid places like this. It will become difficulty to get physicians, lawyers (that may not be a bad thing), nurses, and teachers. Of course the Republicans will thump that Bible in their hand, while spewing more hate our way. Sadly, the ACLU efforts in SC are lacking. Yes, they have responded, but I remember last year when the question of banning care to minors. The efforts were disorganized. 

 

Maybe the future will change, but in a lot of states, I am not so sure. It is truly disheartening.

Link to comment

Pretty sure this violates the First Amendment.  The government doesn't get to define identity or tell people how to talk.  That's Un-American.  Usually the Republicans have been the party of free speech, but they clearly don't get that it applies to everybody.  Even folks you don't like....which is why we have a Bill of Rights, not a Bill of Privileges.  Rights are given by God, merely enumerated and helped a bit by government (if government is acting properly.)  What God gives, man doesn't get to take away....which is even more of an affront when done in God's name.  

Link to comment
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 186 Guests (See full list)

    • April Marie
    • MaybeRob
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.6k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,031
    • Most Online
      8,356

    jacobb
    Newest Member
    jacobb
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Adele Svetova
      Adele Svetova
      (25 years old)
    2. BROOKSGLASS
      BROOKSGLASS
      (34 years old)
    3. FinnyFinsterHH
      FinnyFinsterHH
      (16 years old)
    4. fool4luv
      fool4luv
      (26 years old)
    5. itsaddison
      itsaddison
      (20 years old)
  • Posts

    • atlantis63
      thanks. good to be back
    • Carolyn Marie
      https://www.cnn.com/2024/04/27/politics/lgbtq-health-care-biden-administration-rules-affordable-care-act/index.html   Personally, I think this is a very good thing.   Carolyn Marie
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      I'd love to have a dinner party with Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin, Voltaire, and Ayn Rand.  Would definitely be an interesting time. 
    • Abigail Genevieve
      In the forward I learn that transgenderism is bad, and somewhere else that transgender ideology is bad.  I have not yet read a definition of either in the document.  I assume they are the same.  I know Focus on a Family has a definition of transgenderism on their website, or did, but I am not sure this is the same as that.  I might agree that transgenderism is bad if they use a definition I condemn (e.g. transgenderism means you always pour ketchup in your shoes before you put them on - I could not agree to that).  Is someone who believes in transgenderism, whatever it is, a transgenderist? I never see that term.  There may be other definitions out there, but I don't think there is an Official Definition that we all agree to.
    • RaineOnYourParade
      Crazy fact, was gonna go to the school where this went down at before I moved, have a lot of friends there. I know at least one of my friends met the guy on one occasion, not knowing who it was.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      They are thinking of Loudon.  The problem there was the girls were not protected from a known predator, who was moved from one school to another instead being effectively disciplined.  Outlaw school administrators? <sarc>
    • Abigail Genevieve
      How ironic.  I agree with the governor "“You cannot change your gender; you cannot pick your gender…there is a confused group of people that somehow think you can,”    - we are what we are, we are fighting the fact we CANNOT change our gender, which we did not pick.  Many if not all of us would not have picked a trans condition and have sought to evade, deny or move out or resolve it anyway we can.  Those who are confused on this issue are not trans folk.  They want us to change our gender but they deny we can.  Confusion.  
    • Vidanjali
      @FinnyFinsterHH no one can satisfy your questions about what will the future hold. But I can advise you to slow your mind down as much as you're able. Take it slow and one moment at a time. This advice goes beyond the practical reality that that's truly all you can do - further, try to enjoy each moment. It's clear you have a lot of aspirations regarding transition. But it's best to try to accept the bounds of your life circumstances at present because if you develop worries or even resentments about them, that will only make you bitter and more anxious. Instead, try to focus on anything you find affirming. Practice positive self-talk and give yourself affirmations too. Try to let go of expectations of your family members - they can only deal with change to the capacity they're able due to their own life conditions. Allow them grace as you wish they would allow you. Practice patience.   Try this exercise - read through your post and make one list of the positive developments and another of things you cannot control (including the future). If you have a sense of spirituality, offer the second list as a sacrifice to however you understand a higher power - leave it in their hands. If you're not spiritual, then offer it up to hope. Then throw that list away. Keep the list of positives and leave some room on it because guaranteed you'll have more and more to add. Look forward to that, but don't let your mind think it can rush things. Try to enjoy the ride. 
    • Vidanjali
      Happy birthday, Sam! Lotsa love!
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I still have not read much of this.  Very little of this document pertains to trans folk.  Some of the statements are more than problematic concerning trans folk.   It certainly was not written just to get us.   " those with gender dysphoria should be expelled from military service."  and "Reverse policies that allow transgender individuals to serve in the military. Gender dysphoria is incompatible with the demands of military service,"  https://static.project2025.org/2025_MandateForLeadership_CHAPTER-04.pdf are two lines out of hundreds if not thousands regarding the Department of Defense, targeting trans folk in an almost off-hand manner.    So if a fighter pilot, say, or a ship's captain, highly experienced and trained at enormous expense, is determined to be transgender (method unknown) the US loses someone badly needed due to the personnel shortage who is ready, willing and able to perform their duties.  Many trans folk have served well and transitioned later.  I don't think this point is well thought out.    A number of policy recommendations I would disagree with.  I am not sure there is a method to discuss those with the authors; I am attempting to find out.  I have good conservative creds.    They are fully intending to implement this, regardless of who the president is, as long as that president is conservative. It is not Trump centered.  I don't think he had anything to do with it. 
    • April Marie
      I wear a Delimira Mastectomy sleep bra with Vollence sleep rated breast forms. The form fit inside pockets so they don't touch your skin. I bought the bras on Amazon and found the forms on eBay. They were much less expensive than buying through the other sources. 
    • Ashley0616
      I wore an olive corduroy coverall dress with a navy blue shirt underneath. 
    • Ashley0616
      @LittleSamCongratulations on one of the biggest decisions. Looking forward to your progress. 
    • Ivy
      I don't wear a bra to bed.  The girls aren't big enough to need it, but still enough to appreciate.  Just a flannel nightgown suits me fine.
    • Ashley0616
      You're welcome. I'm here quite often if you need me. 
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...