Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Florida Bill Would Require Mass Biological Sex Affidavits, Ending All Trans Legal Recognition


Ivy

Recommended Posts

https://www.erininthemorning.com/p/florida-bill-would-require-mass-biological?utm_source=substack&publication_id=994764&post_id=140363622&utm_medium=email&utm_content=share&utm_campaign=email-share&triggerShare=true&isFreemail=true&r=k5hac

 

The bill, if passed, would end all trans legal recognition and would require all Floridians to sign "biological sex affidavits" when renewing their licenses.

 

"The bill starts by defining “sex” in a way that excludes transgender people and incorporating this definition at the beginning of Florida's legal code - Section 1.01. It demands that every law in Florida adhere to this definition, effectively eliminating all transgender legal recognition in a single move. It then goes through many areas of code and creates additional policies that allow for the tracking of transgender people’s assigned sex at birth and the enforcement of laws that exclude or criminalize them."

 

"The affidavits would be mandatory for all Floridians applying for a driver's license."

 

" this bill, however, could enable government officials to consult a database to enforce the bathroom ban"

 

 "The state, which has been designed one of the worst for transgender people in the country, is showing that it may go even further in its quest to eradicate transgender people from its borders."

Link to comment

I literally cannot even...

 

I'll just say this. There are so many urgent problems, actual problems, in Florida that no one in Tallahassee seems willing to devote time and energy to. It's shameful, all these elected officials who work to oppress rather than uplift. It is surreal living in Florida...

 

Link to comment

"Sex: The classification of a human person as either male or female based on the organization of the body of such person for a specific reproductive role, as indicated by the person’s sex chromosomes, naturally occurring sex hormones, and internal and external genitalia present at birth."

 

Based off their own bill I am neither male nor female but both (intersex). 

 

Internal and external genitalia of both, natural female sex hormones, but male chromosomes. 

Link to comment
  • Admin

I will really have a sore neck if I shake my head as violently over this as I am tempted to do.  I really suspect that the guy, and it would be a male with low low melanin has his hand in his pocket as he thinks about the fame this will give him <redacted>. 🤬🤬🤬

Link to comment

 

2 hours ago, Ivy said:

"The state, which has been designed one of the worst for transgender people in the country, is showing that it may go even further in its quest to eradicate transgender people from its borders."

 

This is absolutely chilling to read and think about. It is reminiscent of the fate of the Jewish people in occupied Poland and all of occupied Europe. If this does not work to "eradicate all transgender people," then what? First it was registration, then it was wearing the stars, then it was the ghettos, and then it was...

 

If it were any other identity group instead of "transgender," most if not all would decry it as unthinkable. While this bill (hopefully) has no chance to survive in its draconian form, and certainly not without legal challenges to it... I believe the intent of these bills is to try as many extreme things as possible in the hope that something sticks to the books after all the court challenges are over.

 

Love,

~Audrey.

Link to comment

This simply needs to be challenged on scientific grounds, and the proponents need to be charged with using public office for personal agendas. It also justifies the need for an overriding Federal Law to prevent this happening in the future. Australia has Federal anti discrimination laws which make race, physical handicaps, and gender identity protected attributes, so nobody can discriminate against these. 

 

If these laws get up in Florida, other states will follow. 

 

Hugs,

 

Allie

Link to comment

If I were to share this news with certain family members, they would brush it aside and say it won't happen. Getting real tired of these head-in-the-sand cisgender people.

Link to comment
21 minutes ago, emeraldmountain2 said:

Getting real tired of these head-in-the-sand cisgender people.

They don't really care anyway.   They've no skin in the game.

Link to comment
18 minutes ago, Ivy said:

They don't really care anyway.   They've no skin in the game.

They care and they care about me, but they are oblivious. I try to educate them, but they stick their heads in the sand out of fear for me (i.e.: denial) and/or for their love for the Republican party.

Link to comment
  • Admin

Yeah, it's extreme as all get-out, and certainly unconstitutional.  Given that it would effect cis-folk too, I doubt it will pass, but who knows?  It's too soon for any organization to file a lawsuit, but I have alerted my colleagues at the NCTE to be aware.

 

Given that this is an election year, and the R's nationally have nothing whatsoever to run on, all they have is running against us, against education, against Biden, against science. and against anything else they can think of to distract the "base."  At least with the base, it will work.

 

Carolyn Marie

Link to comment

Part of my brain wants to post a snappy comeback about how awful Florida is treating the transgender population. I do not want to violate the terms of service. I simply vote with my feet. I will never set foot in Florida again. I lived there for 2 years about 20 years ago. Have not been down there since I left in 2005. Stories like this one are very demoralizing.

Link to comment
2 hours ago, Carolyn Marie said:

Given that this is an election year, and the R's nationally have nothing whatsoever to run on, all they have is running against us, against education, against Biden, against science. and against anything else they can think of to distract the "base."  At least with the base, it will work.

 

I don't think it really works even with the base.  Not around here, at least.  Its discouraging when there's so much they can run on and be right about...they absolutely refuse to do it.  They get votes by default at this point, just for NOT being Democrat and because there's basically nobody else. 

 

I'm not sure if this bill is constitutional or not.  But it is onerous and icky.  It would be interesting to expand the issue and make a case for removing all ID itself as being unconstitutional.  May not be possible, but something I would definitely support.  Time to stop all the numbering, fingerprinting, addressing, taxing, bothering, persecuting, etc. and just leave folks alone regardless of who they are or aren't.  Sadly, I doubt that will happen. 

Link to comment

I have to wonder what is next in Florida. Will they have reeducation camps for trans folks? Will they mandate tattoos with a prisoner number? Will they require jumpsuits to identify the trans folks? Any parallels to another time period in the world folks, perhaps from as far back as 90 years ago in a certain European country??? 

 

After us, I wonder who the next group of interest will be for states like Florida? 

Link to comment
11 minutes ago, KatieSC said:

I have to wonder what is next in Florida. Will they have reeducation camps for trans folks? Will they mandate tattoos with a prisoner number? Will they require jumpsuits to identify the trans folks? Any parallels to another time period in the world folks, perhaps from as far back as 90 years ago in a certain European country??? 

 

After us, I wonder who the next group of interest will be for states like Florida? 

They're playing from the same playbook back then. Big difference now is that they have very advanced technology at their disposal to spread propaganda via social media and to track/monitor/control their "enemies" if they gain more power.

Link to comment
17 hours ago, Audrey said:

While this bill (hopefully) has no chance to survive in its draconian form, and certainly not without legal challenges to it... I believe the intent of these bills is to try as many extreme things as possible in the hope that something sticks to the books after all the court challenges are over.

 

DeSantis is spending unprecedented vast sums of taxpayer money on legal funds to defend oppressive laws and periodically asking to increase that budget.

https://www.clickorlando.com/news/investigators/2024/01/02/desantis-asks-for-millions-to-fight-lawsuits-challenging-new-laws/

Link to comment
  • Admin
27 minutes ago, Vidanjali said:

DeSantis is spending unprecedented vast sums of taxpayer money on legal funds to defend oppressive laws and periodically asking to increase that budget.

 

I am going to go into my most soundproof room and start laughing about this one so loud that it would probably get the neighbors calling authorities about me.  A 40 year career in government service, plus my degree in Public Administration gave me big hints that this was going to happen long ago.  The man has absolutely no sense of how governments are made to work, and how they work monetarily.  I am proud of my state on one issue here, bills that are proposed go through a group of lawyers and Public Administration experts, collectively know as Legislative Analysts who look at the bills and assign a Price Tag to the bill, which is their best estimate (always high) of the economic impact that it will have in terms or the state budget including state attorney fees, Judicial Salaries, Law enforcement expenses and other items that show how much taxpayer money could be used in a worst case scenario.  Then the price tag is MADE PUBLIC and can be seen by any interested person.  I saw a report of the bills dropped early in the game by the price tags on them for many years as part of my job in my agency.  They need more publicity of the pain in the pocket the taxpayers are going to have from him.  His opponents need to get that out and loud.

Link to comment
8 hours ago, VickySGV said:

 

I am going to go into my most soundproof room and start laughing about this one so loud that it would probably get the neighbors calling authorities about me. 

 

I actually heard you here in SFL 😆

 

8 hours ago, VickySGV said:

Legislative Analysts who look at the bills and assign a Price Tag to the bill...how much taxpayer money could be used in a worst case scenario.  Then the price tag is MADE PUBLIC

 

Transparency??? Sigh, that is a DREAM.

 

8 hours ago, VickySGV said:

They need more publicity of the pain in the pocket the taxpayers are going to have from him.  His opponents need to get that out and loud.

 

For real. I bring it up whenever I can. 

Link to comment
  • Who's Online   6 Members, 0 Anonymous, 137 Guests (See full list)

    • VickySGV
    • Carolyn Marie
    • Evelyn J
    • Jet McCartney
    • Ashley0616
    • awkward-yet-sweet
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.6k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,031
    • Most Online
      8,356

    jacobb
    Newest Member
    jacobb
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Adele Svetova
      Adele Svetova
      (25 years old)
    2. BROOKSGLASS
      BROOKSGLASS
      (34 years old)
    3. FinnyFinsterHH
      FinnyFinsterHH
      (16 years old)
    4. fool4luv
      fool4luv
      (26 years old)
    5. itsaddison
      itsaddison
      (20 years old)
  • Posts

    • Carolyn Marie
      https://www.cnn.com/2024/04/27/politics/lgbtq-health-care-biden-administration-rules-affordable-care-act/index.html   Personally, I think this is a very good thing.   Carolyn Marie
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      I'd love to have a dinner party with Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin, Voltaire, and Ayn Rand.  Would definitely be an interesting time. 
    • Abigail Genevieve
      In the forward I learn that transgenderism is bad, and somewhere else that transgender ideology is bad.  I have not yet read a definition of either in the document.  I assume they are the same.  I know Focus on a Family has a definition of transgenderism on their website, or did, but I am not sure this is the same as that.  I might agree that transgenderism is bad if they use a definition I condemn (e.g. transgenderism means you always pour ketchup in your shoes before you put them on - I could not agree to that).  Is someone who believes in transgenderism, whatever it is, a transgenderist? I never see that term.  There may be other definitions out there, but I don't think there is an Official Definition that we all agree to.
    • RaineOnYourParade
      Crazy fact, was gonna go to the school where this went down at before I moved, have a lot of friends there. I know at least one of my friends met the guy on one occasion, not knowing who it was.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      They are thinking of Loudon.  The problem there was the girls were not protected from a known predator, who was moved from one school to another instead being effectively disciplined.  Outlaw school administrators? <sarc>
    • Abigail Genevieve
      How ironic.  I agree with the governor "“You cannot change your gender; you cannot pick your gender…there is a confused group of people that somehow think you can,”    - we are what we are, we are fighting the fact we CANNOT change our gender, which we did not pick.  Many if not all of us would not have picked a trans condition and have sought to evade, deny or move out or resolve it anyway we can.  Those who are confused on this issue are not trans folk.  They want us to change our gender but they deny we can.  Confusion.  
    • Vidanjali
      @FinnyFinsterHH no one can satisfy your questions about what will the future hold. But I can advise you to slow your mind down as much as you're able. Take it slow and one moment at a time. This advice goes beyond the practical reality that that's truly all you can do - further, try to enjoy each moment. It's clear you have a lot of aspirations regarding transition. But it's best to try to accept the bounds of your life circumstances at present because if you develop worries or even resentments about them, that will only make you bitter and more anxious. Instead, try to focus on anything you find affirming. Practice positive self-talk and give yourself affirmations too. Try to let go of expectations of your family members - they can only deal with change to the capacity they're able due to their own life conditions. Allow them grace as you wish they would allow you. Practice patience.   Try this exercise - read through your post and make one list of the positive developments and another of things you cannot control (including the future). If you have a sense of spirituality, offer the second list as a sacrifice to however you understand a higher power - leave it in their hands. If you're not spiritual, then offer it up to hope. Then throw that list away. Keep the list of positives and leave some room on it because guaranteed you'll have more and more to add. Look forward to that, but don't let your mind think it can rush things. Try to enjoy the ride. 
    • Vidanjali
      Happy birthday, Sam! Lotsa love!
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I still have not read much of this.  Very little of this document pertains to trans folk.  Some of the statements are more than problematic concerning trans folk.   It certainly was not written just to get us.   " those with gender dysphoria should be expelled from military service."  and "Reverse policies that allow transgender individuals to serve in the military. Gender dysphoria is incompatible with the demands of military service,"  https://static.project2025.org/2025_MandateForLeadership_CHAPTER-04.pdf are two lines out of hundreds if not thousands regarding the Department of Defense, targeting trans folk in an almost off-hand manner.    So if a fighter pilot, say, or a ship's captain, highly experienced and trained at enormous expense, is determined to be transgender (method unknown) the US loses someone badly needed due to the personnel shortage who is ready, willing and able to perform their duties.  Many trans folk have served well and transitioned later.  I don't think this point is well thought out.    A number of policy recommendations I would disagree with.  I am not sure there is a method to discuss those with the authors; I am attempting to find out.  I have good conservative creds.    They are fully intending to implement this, regardless of who the president is, as long as that president is conservative. It is not Trump centered.  I don't think he had anything to do with it. 
    • April Marie
      I wear a Delimira Mastectomy sleep bra with Vollence sleep rated breast forms. The form fit inside pockets so they don't touch your skin. I bought the bras on Amazon and found the forms on eBay. They were much less expensive than buying through the other sources. 
    • Ashley0616
      I wore an olive corduroy coverall dress with a navy blue shirt underneath. 
    • Ashley0616
      @LittleSamCongratulations on one of the biggest decisions. Looking forward to your progress. 
    • Ivy
      I don't wear a bra to bed.  The girls aren't big enough to need it, but still enough to appreciate.  Just a flannel nightgown suits me fine.
    • Ashley0616
      You're welcome. I'm here quite often if you need me. 
    • Ashley0616
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...