Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

SC Library Board Moves Trans-Themed Books Out of Children's Section


Carolyn Marie

Recommended Posts

I have mixed feelings about transgender kids' books in libraries.  It is a really, really delicate subject.  On one hand, I feel like parents who wish to address the topic with their kids ought to have access to age-appropriate literature to assist them.  On the other hand, I feel like kids probably shouldn't be exploring the topic without parental supervision...same with sex ed materials of any sort.  I believe that discussions and explorations of sex and gender topics should be family-led and intentional, rather than school-led or accidental. 

 

Of course, a question in my mind is whether children really browse the public library's collections without a parent around? And if they do, do they limit themselves to the children's sections?  I'm not sure what moving the materials around accomplishes?

Link to comment

I feel like it should be something that should be left alone and if they want to read it than more power to them. I do feel like kids should be kids and create a life full of hopes and dreams. It's a magical part of life. Is it wrong they removed it yes but it's not ending of the world type disappointment. In almost every way that trans has been taught to kids has been that we are the fun group and live life to the fullest. In a certain viewpoint we are grooming them. Heck who wouldn't want that kind of life. They only see the bright side and not the struggles and disappointments that we face every day. Life isn't always sunshine and rainbows. I have taught my kids both sides of the coin. They see how many people actually support us. They have seen neighbors go from friendly to ghost and the hatred of the world. I have shown them that sometimes the price of living your true self you pretty much stand alone. I can't show them the support for the community because there is next to none. The price you pay to live in a diehard red state. 

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator
On 3/2/2024 at 9:08 PM, awkward-yet-sweet said:

Of course, a question in my mind is whether children really browse the public library's collections without a parent around? And if they do, do they limit themselves to the children's sections?

At our local library in the Seattle area, it’s uncommon to see preteens unaccompanied. Most come with their parents. Others come to the library with their friends of similar age. I don’t see them perusing around the adult sections (except the movie DVD’s and music CD’s). I doubt these youngsters would look for these topics with their friends or a parents present.

 

When I was younger ~11 or 12 years old (early 1970’s), I would go to the library alone with the sole intention of finding anything I could regarding my increasing desire about wanting to be a girl. I was too embarrassed to ask for help finding this information. I also didn’t know where to start looking. I was never actually able to find anything specific to that topic way back then. I do wish I had been able to find something related but to my knowledge, these books were just not available at that time. It would’ve been a valuable resource had there been even one. I doubt I would’ve been able to check it out because of my shame. Reading about others like myself existing in this world would’ve helped me so much. As it turns out, the real shame is not having such resources available. IMHO, These book bans are the wrong answer. Hiding our existence by hiding our stories is pretty much what I did my entire childhood.

 

Susan R🌷

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator
4 hours ago, Susan R said:

I was never actually able to find anything specific to that topic way back then.

I would have loved to find something that related to my feelings.  Perhaps i would not have felt so ashamed or alone.  I could not talk to my parents.  They would have denied my reality and double downed on manning me up.  At that point 50'sand 60's i was a crime in hiding.  That is what the GOP is trying to create.  Hopefully knowledge rather than oppression wins out.  Regardless the reality of those of us out and about will not be forgotten,

 

Hugs,

 

Charlize

Link to comment
  • Admin

"60 Minutes" did a really nice piece last night about the "Mom's For Liberty" group, which is largely responsible for the national book banning movement.  One town in South Carolina was featured; their library board looked into the list of 97 books recommended for banning by MFL and after one year of study, found only 5 worthy of being removed from the kid's section of the public library.  The interview with the two leaders of MFL was classic "60 Minutes;" they came out looking like fools and nut jobs.  :applause:

 

Carolyn Marie

Link to comment
  • Admin

The MFL group has actually been voted out of several school boards recently, which is a good start to undo their mischief.  How many of them are actually mothers of children, and which of them are under investigation by Child Protective Services agencies?? 

Link to comment

I can't tell if the Moms for Liberty group is focused only on school libraries or if they look at general public libraries as well.  Because the purpose of those venues is rather different.  I see school libraries as a much more focused collection, especially for the younger grades. In this topic's headline story, the South Carolina library in question is a public library

 

I did check out some of the "60 Minutes" interview, and I'm suspicious.  Seems it was filmed in October but heavily edited and only released recently.  Typical establishment media stuff.  I think one of the worst things you can say about MFL is that they assumed the presentation would be unbiased and consented to participate.  I would have thought they'd be smarter than that. 

 

It seems the book banning efforts aren't particularly coordinated.  They get together in a group and rate books on a 1 to 5 scale on issues like nudity or sexual descriptions.  Local folks then see what titles are on the shelves, and decide whether they want to get rid of everything that's a 3 or greater, or just a 5....something like that.  I doubt efforts are consistent from place to place. 

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 164 Guests (See full list)

    • Ashley0616
    • Heather Shay
    • April Marie
    • MaybeRob
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.6k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,031
    • Most Online
      8,356

    jacobb
    Newest Member
    jacobb
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Adele Svetova
      Adele Svetova
      (25 years old)
    2. BROOKSGLASS
      BROOKSGLASS
      (34 years old)
    3. FinnyFinsterHH
      FinnyFinsterHH
      (16 years old)
    4. fool4luv
      fool4luv
      (26 years old)
    5. itsaddison
      itsaddison
      (20 years old)
  • Posts

    • Heather Shay
      Neither up nor down, just being.
    • Heather Shay
      Tension is not a well-understood psychological state. It can be both positive and negative, much like stress itself. A 2015 research paper on the theoretical framework of tension notes it's an anticipatory emotional state which tends to be associated with: conflict.
    • Heather Shay
    • Heather Shay
    • Heather Shay
    • atlantis63
      thanks. good to be back
    • Carolyn Marie
      https://www.cnn.com/2024/04/27/politics/lgbtq-health-care-biden-administration-rules-affordable-care-act/index.html   Personally, I think this is a very good thing.   Carolyn Marie
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      I'd love to have a dinner party with Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin, Voltaire, and Ayn Rand.  Would definitely be an interesting time. 
    • Abigail Genevieve
      In the forward I learn that transgenderism is bad, and somewhere else that transgender ideology is bad.  I have not yet read a definition of either in the document.  I assume they are the same.  I know Focus on a Family has a definition of transgenderism on their website, or did, but I am not sure this is the same as that.  I might agree that transgenderism is bad if they use a definition I condemn (e.g. transgenderism means you always pour ketchup in your shoes before you put them on - I could not agree to that).  Is someone who believes in transgenderism, whatever it is, a transgenderist? I never see that term.  There may be other definitions out there, but I don't think there is an Official Definition that we all agree to.
    • RaineOnYourParade
      Crazy fact, was gonna go to the school where this went down at before I moved, have a lot of friends there. I know at least one of my friends met the guy on one occasion, not knowing who it was.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      They are thinking of Loudon.  The problem there was the girls were not protected from a known predator, who was moved from one school to another instead being effectively disciplined.  Outlaw school administrators? <sarc>
    • Abigail Genevieve
      How ironic.  I agree with the governor "“You cannot change your gender; you cannot pick your gender…there is a confused group of people that somehow think you can,”    - we are what we are, we are fighting the fact we CANNOT change our gender, which we did not pick.  Many if not all of us would not have picked a trans condition and have sought to evade, deny or move out or resolve it anyway we can.  Those who are confused on this issue are not trans folk.  They want us to change our gender but they deny we can.  Confusion.  
    • Vidanjali
      @FinnyFinsterHH no one can satisfy your questions about what will the future hold. But I can advise you to slow your mind down as much as you're able. Take it slow and one moment at a time. This advice goes beyond the practical reality that that's truly all you can do - further, try to enjoy each moment. It's clear you have a lot of aspirations regarding transition. But it's best to try to accept the bounds of your life circumstances at present because if you develop worries or even resentments about them, that will only make you bitter and more anxious. Instead, try to focus on anything you find affirming. Practice positive self-talk and give yourself affirmations too. Try to let go of expectations of your family members - they can only deal with change to the capacity they're able due to their own life conditions. Allow them grace as you wish they would allow you. Practice patience.   Try this exercise - read through your post and make one list of the positive developments and another of things you cannot control (including the future). If you have a sense of spirituality, offer the second list as a sacrifice to however you understand a higher power - leave it in their hands. If you're not spiritual, then offer it up to hope. Then throw that list away. Keep the list of positives and leave some room on it because guaranteed you'll have more and more to add. Look forward to that, but don't let your mind think it can rush things. Try to enjoy the ride. 
    • Vidanjali
      Happy birthday, Sam! Lotsa love!
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I still have not read much of this.  Very little of this document pertains to trans folk.  Some of the statements are more than problematic concerning trans folk.   It certainly was not written just to get us.   " those with gender dysphoria should be expelled from military service."  and "Reverse policies that allow transgender individuals to serve in the military. Gender dysphoria is incompatible with the demands of military service,"  https://static.project2025.org/2025_MandateForLeadership_CHAPTER-04.pdf are two lines out of hundreds if not thousands regarding the Department of Defense, targeting trans folk in an almost off-hand manner.    So if a fighter pilot, say, or a ship's captain, highly experienced and trained at enormous expense, is determined to be transgender (method unknown) the US loses someone badly needed due to the personnel shortage who is ready, willing and able to perform their duties.  Many trans folk have served well and transitioned later.  I don't think this point is well thought out.    A number of policy recommendations I would disagree with.  I am not sure there is a method to discuss those with the authors; I am attempting to find out.  I have good conservative creds.    They are fully intending to implement this, regardless of who the president is, as long as that president is conservative. It is not Trump centered.  I don't think he had anything to do with it. 
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...