Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

SC Library Board Moves Trans-Themed Books Out of Children's Section


Carolyn Marie

Recommended Posts

I have mixed feelings about transgender kids' books in libraries.  It is a really, really delicate subject.  On one hand, I feel like parents who wish to address the topic with their kids ought to have access to age-appropriate literature to assist them.  On the other hand, I feel like kids probably shouldn't be exploring the topic without parental supervision...same with sex ed materials of any sort.  I believe that discussions and explorations of sex and gender topics should be family-led and intentional, rather than school-led or accidental. 

 

Of course, a question in my mind is whether children really browse the public library's collections without a parent around? And if they do, do they limit themselves to the children's sections?  I'm not sure what moving the materials around accomplishes?

Link to comment

I feel like it should be something that should be left alone and if they want to read it than more power to them. I do feel like kids should be kids and create a life full of hopes and dreams. It's a magical part of life. Is it wrong they removed it yes but it's not ending of the world type disappointment. In almost every way that trans has been taught to kids has been that we are the fun group and live life to the fullest. In a certain viewpoint we are grooming them. Heck who wouldn't want that kind of life. They only see the bright side and not the struggles and disappointments that we face every day. Life isn't always sunshine and rainbows. I have taught my kids both sides of the coin. They see how many people actually support us. They have seen neighbors go from friendly to ghost and the hatred of the world. I have shown them that sometimes the price of living your true self you pretty much stand alone. I can't show them the support for the community because there is next to none. The price you pay to live in a diehard red state. 

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator
On 3/2/2024 at 9:08 PM, awkward-yet-sweet said:

Of course, a question in my mind is whether children really browse the public library's collections without a parent around? And if they do, do they limit themselves to the children's sections?

At our local library in the Seattle area, it’s uncommon to see preteens unaccompanied. Most come with their parents. Others come to the library with their friends of similar age. I don’t see them perusing around the adult sections (except the movie DVD’s and music CD’s). I doubt these youngsters would look for these topics with their friends or a parents present.

 

When I was younger ~11 or 12 years old (early 1970’s), I would go to the library alone with the sole intention of finding anything I could regarding my increasing desire about wanting to be a girl. I was too embarrassed to ask for help finding this information. I also didn’t know where to start looking. I was never actually able to find anything specific to that topic way back then. I do wish I had been able to find something related but to my knowledge, these books were just not available at that time. It would’ve been a valuable resource had there been even one. I doubt I would’ve been able to check it out because of my shame. Reading about others like myself existing in this world would’ve helped me so much. As it turns out, the real shame is not having such resources available. IMHO, These book bans are the wrong answer. Hiding our existence by hiding our stories is pretty much what I did my entire childhood.

 

Susan R🌷

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator
4 hours ago, Susan R said:

I was never actually able to find anything specific to that topic way back then.

I would have loved to find something that related to my feelings.  Perhaps i would not have felt so ashamed or alone.  I could not talk to my parents.  They would have denied my reality and double downed on manning me up.  At that point 50'sand 60's i was a crime in hiding.  That is what the GOP is trying to create.  Hopefully knowledge rather than oppression wins out.  Regardless the reality of those of us out and about will not be forgotten,

 

Hugs,

 

Charlize

Link to comment
  • Admin

"60 Minutes" did a really nice piece last night about the "Mom's For Liberty" group, which is largely responsible for the national book banning movement.  One town in South Carolina was featured; their library board looked into the list of 97 books recommended for banning by MFL and after one year of study, found only 5 worthy of being removed from the kid's section of the public library.  The interview with the two leaders of MFL was classic "60 Minutes;" they came out looking like fools and nut jobs.  :applause:

 

Carolyn Marie

Link to comment
  • Admin

The MFL group has actually been voted out of several school boards recently, which is a good start to undo their mischief.  How many of them are actually mothers of children, and which of them are under investigation by Child Protective Services agencies?? 

Link to comment

I can't tell if the Moms for Liberty group is focused only on school libraries or if they look at general public libraries as well.  Because the purpose of those venues is rather different.  I see school libraries as a much more focused collection, especially for the younger grades. In this topic's headline story, the South Carolina library in question is a public library

 

I did check out some of the "60 Minutes" interview, and I'm suspicious.  Seems it was filmed in October but heavily edited and only released recently.  Typical establishment media stuff.  I think one of the worst things you can say about MFL is that they assumed the presentation would be unbiased and consented to participate.  I would have thought they'd be smarter than that. 

 

It seems the book banning efforts aren't particularly coordinated.  They get together in a group and rate books on a 1 to 5 scale on issues like nudity or sexual descriptions.  Local folks then see what titles are on the shelves, and decide whether they want to get rid of everything that's a 3 or greater, or just a 5....something like that.  I doubt efforts are consistent from place to place. 

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   6 Members, 0 Anonymous, 218 Guests (See full list)

    • April Marie
    • Thea
    • Astrid
    • blakethetiredracc00n
    • Mmindy
    • Abigail Genevieve
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.8k
    • Total Posts
      769.9k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,084
    • Most Online
      8,356

    Amberoni
    Newest Member
    Amberoni
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. FullyHart
      FullyHart
    2. MariPosa
      MariPosa
      (65 years old)
    3. pechenezhka
      pechenezhka
      (17 years old)
    4. Rubycd
      Rubycd
      (59 years old)
    5. Yana
      Yana
      (31 years old)
  • Posts

    • Mmindy
      I'm sorry for asking so many questions about your situation. I'm in your camp and believe you should be able to be whoever you feel you need to be. I guess it the Union Shop Stewart coming out in me. I want you to be treated fairly as well as respectably. You're human, you're a client of theirs. Especially if you're paying money to be there.   Hugs,   Mindy🌈🐛🏳️‍⚧️🦋
    • Birdie
      I'm not sure the time frame.
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      Views, terminology, and aspects of how events came to be....aren't those directly related to the news item?  If not, I'm rather confused.
    • Ivy
    • VickySGV
      Second warning, this has gotten far and apart from the NEWS item that it started out with and is becoming a flat out battleground over political leanings and terminology. 
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      Welcome to Lefty Land.... a festive theme park full of sparkles and unicorns, a perfect place except for one evil orange dragon wearing a blond wig.    I'm always amazed at the "flexibility" of definitions.  One person's f@scist seems like a centrist to others.  One person's "moderate" looks to others like the 2nd coming of Fidel Castro.  A normal marriage a century or two ago is now a criminal offense, and relationships that used to be a criminal offense are now open, normal marriages.  Pedophiles now want to be called "minor attracted persons" and teenagers are now defined as children.  A Republican in NY or CA would be a Democrat just about anywhere else.  I'm certainly no advocate for relativism, these are just observations.    What I find interesting about this Australian candidate is the attitude that he shouldn't be allowed to run for office.  Why?  Just because his views are different, or even offensive?  Who makes that determination?  Can an election really be open and fair if it is barred to candidates who are not "politically correct?"  Here in the USA, we can openly have candidates who are f@scist or any other thing they want to be, no real restrictions aside from eligibility requirements related to age, location, citizenship, and criminal record.           
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      @Birdie You certainly have more patience than I do.  I don't take it well if I get scolded.  Either I sulk or I get nippish.    We had a good Mother's Day here yesterday.  Quite an event, since 4 of my partners are mothers.  GF enjoys it a lot, because she's very (excessively?) proud of having produced her 5 kids.  Her eldest starts school this fall.  Amazing how time flies...
    • MaeBe
      Reminds me of elementary school when a kid yanked my chair as I was taking a seat. I told him to "go suck an egg" and we both got sent to the principals office. I was like, "tf did I do to deserve that?"
    • MaeBe
      Firstly, it's nice to hear that your other half is now open to you living as you are!   Secondly, things I have noticed, having started shots just before the New Year: Tears do come much more easily I am far more tender with my wife and I like to snuggle more I have noticed anxiety has an increased effect on me I am on a weekly injection, so when I get near my next shot I have noticed feeling a little emotionally "blah" After shots I am much more energetic and bubbly Otherwise, I wouldn't say I've been on any kind of roller coaster of emotion and I'm far from unstable. So take heart and congratulations!
    • Mmindy
      Three reprimands in a certain time frame? It seems like they should drop off the calendar after a period of time. How long can they hold a reprimand on the calendar?   Mindy🌈🐛🏳️‍⚧️🦋
    • Mmindy
      Congratulations on getting the go ahead with HRT. I'm so ready for my wife to drop her opposition. As for the mood swings... I would look forward to them myself.   Hugs,   Mindy🌈🐛🏳️‍⚧️🦋
    • Birdie
      Three reprimands and they suspend attendance for a couple weeks. 
    • Mmindy
      Good for the other participant. What's involved in a reprimand? At our age, what are they going to do? Withhold snacks...   @BirdieI'm sorry you have to put up with such discrimination's. I'm proud that you're standing up for yourself.    Hugs,   Mindy🌈🐛🏳️‍⚧️🦋
    • MaeBe
      You’re so nice! Thank you. ☺️
    • Ashley0616
      I love that picture!
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...