Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Gender vs Gender-norm


Guest Kaylee

Recommended Posts

Guest Kaylee

Good morning ladies and gentlemen,

After clicking a link from one of the posts here on LP, Reading the article (based on bathroom access ), and reading the comments at the bottom of that page, It clicked with me that there is something very wrong with how we use the word “gender”.

The comment I read on the page stated that “Gender is a social construct, and that those that do not feel they match their gender (birth-sex) should simply be themselves, not the opposite sex, and leave women their space in the womens room!” The individual referred multiple times to “female women” needing their own space to feel safe. (as a note, the sign on the door say “Womens room, not females room”). That statement was followed by “I realize that there is a high violence potential in the mens room, and there should be a third option. Now, while going by “Gender = social construct” his comments were somewhat valid, but in reality… I know for a fact that they are wrong!

As a transgender woman, I recognize that while struggling through my life, I have used parts of the “social construct” to try to feel at peace with myself. This meaning I dressed in womens clothing, as all of us ladies have…. Just to feel as normal as I could. However, the ability to dress in womens clothing is NOT why I’ve decided to transition. The clothing I choose to wear going forward is simply a way to express my gender and femininity to society, and to some extent pass as a woman and be accepted as a woman. None of this has to do with how I feel inside, nor why I desire SRS.

I recently watched a video of a mother talking about her 4 year old trans-daughter. The girl was pushing down on her male parts because she felt they didn’t belong. (as a note, I recently unblocked a memory from childhood, that I really just didn’t want to touch “IT” when I was about the same age.) That feeling, has NOTHING…. to do with “social-norm” and certainly not part of some “social construct”! It has to do with an internal feeling, a psychological feeling of gender.

There are many words that have multiple meanings…. They’re called homonyms. (you know… Row, bear, fly). While gender has long been thought of as a social construct, even Websters Dictionary has updated the meaning.

“Gender: the behavioral, cultural, or psychological traits typically associated with one sex”.

I honestly wanted to go on that website, and just slam the guy (sorry, it’s my natural instinct… I love to argue) but what I have come to realize, is that perhaps even “we” have been slacking off on pointing out the difference between the 2 meanings. I think a notable difference between “Gender”… and “Gender-norm” perhaps?

You know… we as humans think of TIME as linear… because we perceive it that way. We keep a calendar (a social construct used to monitor history) We are born, grow, and die… and that suggests time only moves forward. But there are theories that suggest time is not linear (wormholes, warped space, multiple universes). Most people continue to perceive gender as social… because that is what they see with their own eyes… and have never “felt” out of place in their own body!

Am I the only one that thinks this way?

Kay

Link to comment
  • Admin

I do think you have hit some very valid points here. I see this often in the forums here where the supposedly same notion of gender can bring people yapping and snarling and nipping at throats like two dogs after one bone. BIG SIGH!!!

Link to comment

Well first:

I recently watched a video of a mother talking about her 4 year old trans-daughter. The girl was pushing down on her male parts because she felt they didn’t belong. (as a note, I recently unblocked a memory from childhood, that I really just didn’t want to touch “IT” when I was about the same age.) That feeling, has NOTHING…. to do with “social-norm” and certainly not part of some “social construct”! It has to do with an internal feeling, a psychological feeling of gender.

I don't have this memory, but my mom has told me I did the same exact thing!

Now on to your main point:

Yep. I have a freaking treatise on this site, on my blog, that delves deep into this problem. The crux of the issue is that too many people have too many definitions of what "gender" is and that the term "transgender" too also carries multiple definitions.

For starters, no one can really agree on what "gender" is in the first place. Other than most academics agreeing that it's not between your legs. That would be sex. But there are two vastly opposed camps: the gender-essentialist view and the social-construct view with completely opposite perceptions of what it is. One claims gender, and most gendered behaviors are innate and biological - based on millennia of evolution - girls play with dolls because their brain has natural mothering instincts. The other claims gendered behaviors are entirely constructed by society (and usually the term patriarchy is thrown around). Girls play with dolls only because they're encouraged to play with dolls. The two arguments are both used to explain everything from fashion, career choices, anything with a gendered slant. Of course the reality is undoubtably in between somewhere - biological predispositions that have been exaggerated and enforced by society but Ha! there's no room for compromise in debate!

The the term "transgender' comes in an muddles everything up. These days it applies to anyone that is a part-time crossdresser all the way to someone who does a full blown transition. Obviously the motivations and personal experiences are vastly different across this range. One descriptor does not really apply. So that's problem #1. Problem #2 occurs because, based on the definition of gender, the term "transgender" implies a disconnect in gendered behaviors and expectations, not physical body. Of course to which the logical response is indeed "why become a woman? We really just need to break down gender norms!. And of course there are some transgender/transexual people for whom this is exactly the case. They transition to the opposite sex almost solely for social reasons. But there is another kind of transgender person, one for whom the problem lies in the physical body that gives them so much pain. We too are labeled "transgender", often out of our own choice because of the stigma, and dirty sound associated with "transexual". We might have a problem with our gender as well, but it's really the problem with our sex that causes us to transition - hence "transexual" is really the more accurate term - just not an appealing one. And because of all these words and meanings being used interchangeably it really does cause a lot of confusion among the general public - we can't expect them to take us seriously when on one hand we say "gender is what lies in your mind, how you act, what you feel you are" and then on the other say "I'm transGENDER and I want to change my physical body to match". Because that response makes no sense for a problem that would indeed be solved simply by breaking down gender norms if the first statement was completely true.

There really needs to be a rethinking of terminology and a recognition in the community of the fact that there are many different common trends in the realm of being "transgender" and bundling all of them together under the same word, rather than treating the word simply as an adjective like "caucasian" or "young" - implying no specific experience, just causes immense confusion - both in and outside of the community.

For 3000 more words like this see the blog. : - )

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

I agree with the very valid points!

It is the difference I feel mentally rather than physically with me. I don't have issues with my physical parts (at least not to be considering SRS) but mentally, although somewhat variable I am essentially female. That is even when I am dressed and presenting as male. The clothes, makeup and all have only peripheral meaning when not in a social setting. Especially as it has become an everyday occurrance. More a case of comfort or practicality than anything else, although I find the larger scope of women's clothing makes things interesting. I think gender as a term is not an easy thing to use. That is why I often relate different degrees of being feminine to myself rather than man or woman, and describe myself as androgyne or non- binary. I don't really know what I am apart from me!

Then I think socially :):( - a minefield - I have not worked that one out yet but it sure is interesting at times!

It is complicated as it has taken me a while to write this and I am still not even sure about it - I hope I got my gist - mainly that the term 'gender' is one of my biggest problems.

Tracy

Link to comment

Yep, I have thought deeply on this all my life, although I was never able to tell anyone else my thoughts and feelings until last year when I came out. Back in 1996 a film called "Different for Girls" was released, and when it was picked up by HBO I watched it at my parents house after they had gone to bed. The first thing I saw in the film was a shower scene wherein someone was luxuriating in the water spray while tucking their penis in order to appear female to themselves. I had been doing that since I was a child in a bathtub, I wanted to know what I would look like as a girl, and it also made me feel better. I always did that. When I had developed pec muscles, I would also pull my arms inward in order to make them look like breasts for the same reason. I am pretty certain that this kind of behavior is common amongst MTF transsexuals. Another early, early behavior was that I also urinated sitting down, and got punished for it. I still did it when I could of course, despite all the punishments. It was actually a few years later that I tried on some of my mother's clothes, and since they didn't fit I did not feel good about trying them on. I never did do much cross dressing since it depressed me more that the clothes didn't fit my body than the small relief that I felt wearing them. If that makes any sense.

So yeah, for me at least it was the body dysphoria that drove me to either transition or die when my bell rang last year. Don't get me wrong, I love wearing feminine attire, and I greatly enjoy looking good in a mini-skirt or bikini, but the reason that I like the way I look has far less to do with clothes than the way my body looks. HRT has done wonders for me both physically, and mentally. I am going to do my best to stay healthy so that I can have SRS, that is way, way more important to me than what I am wearing. I just thought I would express my reasons for transitioning, thanks for reading. :)

hugs,

Stephanie

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   8 Members, 0 Anonymous, 195 Guests (See full list)

    • MaryEllen
    • SamC
    • Mmindy
    • MaeBe
    • Ivy
    • Jordyn1215225
    • Ashley0616
    • Abigail Genevieve
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,029
    • Most Online
      8,356

    Selkimur
    Newest Member
    Selkimur
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Anyatimenow
      Anyatimenow
      (23 years old)
    2. Aria00
      Aria00
    3. Ava B.
      Ava B.
      (24 years old)
    4. Claire Heshi
      Claire Heshi
    5. CrystalMatthews0426
      CrystalMatthews0426
      (41 years old)
  • Posts

    • Mmindy
      Congratulations to the mom and family @Ivy on the addition of another child.   Hugs,   Mindy🌈🐛🏳️‍⚧️🦋
    • MaeBe
      Congrats to you and yours!
    • Ashley0616
      YAY! Congratulations on a granddaughter!
    • Ashley0616
      I recommend CarComplaints.com | Car Problems, Car Complaints, & Repair/Recall Information. A lot of good information
    • LucyF
      I've got Spironolactone ___mg and Evorel ___mcg Patches (2 a week) going up to ___mg after 4 weeks 
    • Ivy
      Got a new Granddaughter this morning.  Mother and child (and father) are doing fine. This makes 7 granddaughters and one grandson.  I have 2 sons and 6 daughters myself.  And then I  switched teams.  I think this stuff runs in the family. Another hard day for the patriarchy.
    • Ivy
      Like @MaeBe pointed out, Trump won't do these things personally.  I doubt that he actually gives a rat's a$$ himself.  But he is the foot in the door for the others.   I don't really see this.  Personally, I am all in favor of "traditional" families.  I raised my own kids this way and it can work fine.  But I think we need to allow for other variations as well.   One thing working against this now is how hard it is for a single breadwinner to support a family.  Many people (I know some) would prefer "traditional" if they could actually afford it.  Like I mentioned, we raised our family with this model, but we were always right at the poverty level.   I was a "conservative evangelical" for most of my life, actually.  So I do understand this.  Admittedly, I no longer consider myself one. I have family members still in this camp.  Some tolerate me, one actually rejects me.  I assure you the rejection is on her side, not mine.  But, I understand she believes what she is doing is right - 'sa pity though. I mean no insult toward anyone on this forum.  You're free to disagree with me.  Many people do.   This is a pretty complex one.  Socialism takes many forms, many of which we accept without even realizing it.  "Classism" does exist, for what it's worth.  Always has, probably always will.  But I don't feel like that is a subject for this forum.   As for the election, it's shaping up to be another one of those "hold your nose" deals.
    • Ivy
      Just some exerts regarding subjects of interest to me.
    • Ivy
      Yeah.  In my early teens I trained myself out of a few things that I now wish I hadn't.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I was thinking in particular of BLM, who years ago had a 'What We Believe' section that sounded like they were at war with the nuclear family.   I tried to find it. Nope.  Of interest https://www.politifact.com/article/2020/aug/28/ask-politifact-does-black-lives-matter-aim-destroy/   My time is limited and I will try to answer as I can.
    • Ivy
      Well, I suppose it is possible that they don't actually plan on doing what they say.  I'm not too sure I want to take that chance.  But I kinda expect to find out.  Yet, perhaps you're right and it's all just talk.  And anyway, my state GOP is giving me enough to worry about anyway. I remember a time when being "woke" just meant you were paying attention.  Now it means you are the antichrist. I just don't want the government "protecting" me from my personal "delusions."
    • MaeBe
      1.  I think there are some legitimate concern.   2. Thoroughly discussing this will consume many threads.   3. I disagree partially with @MaeBe but there is partial agreement.   4. The context includes what is happening in society that the authors are observing.  It is not an isolated document.   The observation is through a certain lens, because people do things differently doesn't mean they're doing it wrong. Honestly, a lot of the conservative rhetoric is morphing desires of people to be treated with respect and social equity to be tantamount to the absolution of the family, heterosexuality, etc. Also, being quiet and trying to blend in doesn't change anything. Show me a social change that benefits a minority or marginalized group that didn't need to be loud.   5. Trump, if elected, is as likely to spend his energies going after political opponents as he is to implementing something like this.   Trump will appoint people to do this, like Roger Severino (who was appointed before, who has a record of anti-LGBTQ+ actions), he need not do anything beyond this. His people are ready to push this agenda forward. While the conservative right rails about bureaucracy, they intend to weaponize it. There is no question. They don't want to simplify government, they simply want to fire everyone and bring in conservative "warriors" (their rhetoric). Does America survive 4 year cycles of purge/cronyism?   6. I reject critical theory, which is based on Marxism.  Marxism has never worked and never will.  Critical theory has problems which would need time to go into, which I do not have.   OK, but this seems like every other time CRT comes up with conservatives...completely out of the blue. I think it's reference is mostly just to spark outrage from the base. Definitely food thought for a different thread, though.   7. There are groups who have declared war on the nuclear family as problematically patriarchal, and a lot of other terms. They are easy to find on the internet.  This document is reacting to that (see #4 above).   What is the war on the nuclear family? I searched online and couldn't find much other than reasons why people aren't getting married as much or having kids (that wasn't a propaganda from Heritage or opinions pieces from the right that paint with really broad strokes). Easy things to see: the upward mobility and agency of women, the massive cost of rearing children, general negative attitudes about the future, male insecurity, etc. None of this equates to a war on the nuclear family, but I guess if you look at it as "men should be breadwinners and women must get married for financial support and extend the male family line (and to promote "National Greatness") I could see the decline of marriage as a sign of the collapse of a titled system and, if I was a beneficiary of that system or believe that to NOT be tilted, be aggrieved.   8.  Much of this would have to be legislated, and this is a policy documented.  Implementation would  be most likely different, but that does not mean criticism is unwarranted.   "It might be different if you just give it a chance", unlike all the other legislation that's out there targeting LGBTQ+ from the right, these are going to be different? First it will be trans rights, then it will be gay marriage, and then what? Women's suffrage?   I get it, we may have different compasses, but it's not hard to see that there's no place for queer people in the conservative worldview. There seems to be a consistent insistence that "America was and is no longer Great", as if the 1950s were the pinnacle of society, completely ignoring how great America still is and can continue to be--without having to regress society to the low standards of its patriarchal yesteryears.    
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      Cadillac parts are pretty expensive, so repairing them costs more.  But they don't seem to break down more than other makes.  Lots of Lincoln models use Ford cars as a base, so you can get parts that aren't much more expensive.    My family has had good luck with "Panther platform" cars.  Ford Crown Victoria, Mercury Marquis, Lincoln Towncar or Continental.  4.6 V8 and 5.0 V8.  Reasonable fuel economy, and fairly durable.  Our county sheriff's office was running Chargers and SUV's for a while, but has gone back to older Crown Victorias for ease of maintenance.  GF rebuilds them here.  But they are getting more scarce, since the newest ones were made in 2011.    1992-1997 years were different than the later years.  1998-2001 they did some changes, and apparently the best years are 2003 to 2011.  Check Craigslist, and also government auctions.  GF has gotten a lot of them at auction, and they can be had in rough-but-running shape for around $1,000.  Ones in great shape can be found in the $5,000+ range.  Good for 200,000 miles without significant rebuilding.  Go through engine and transmission and electrical systems, and they go half a million.    Some Chrysler models are OK.  The 300 mostly has the same engines as the Charger and Challenger, so parts availability is pretty good.  But they tend to get timing issues.  The older Chrysler Sebring convertibles were pretty reliable, sometimes going 200,000 miles without tons of problems, although after that they were pretty much worn out. 
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I think I have read everything the Southern Baptists have to say on transgender, and it helped convince me they are dead wrong on these issues.  They can be nice people.  I would never join an SBC church.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      You come across as a thoughtful, sweet, interesting and pleasant person.    There are parts of this country, and more so the world, where evangelicals experience a great deal of finger wagging.
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...