Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Hormones - There And Back Again.


Guest Hydraxide

Recommended Posts

Guest Jo-I-Dunno

Lizzy,

First of all, I don't feel invalidated or angered by everything you're saying, but it seems like you're drawing on your own experience and definitions of male/female and applying it to everyone on feminizing HRT. It's okay to think HRT is a bad idea for non-transitioning people, but your reasoning really bothers me.

HRT as a tool for treatment of gender dysphoria is a reversal of what is naturally occuring. HRT is NOT for adding estrogen, it is adding estrogen and retarding testosterone with testosterone blockers. So all HRT is basically doing is changing a 'male' chemistry into a 'female' chemistry. What does that do? It makes you FEMALE.

So can you just go halfway?

Attributing body-chemistry alone to making someone male or female doesn't make sense to me. Yes, it changes our bodies. Yes, it affects our brains. But it doesn't change our clothes. It doesn't do our makeup. It doesn't pierce our ears. It doesn't do our hair. It doesn't change how we walk or move our arms around. There are so many gender markers that HRT has no effect on.

And your mind changes, does this reverse? Not enough research to know.

I still don't really understand what you call "mindset" and "mind changes". From what I've gathered, you imply you had a "male" brain before but HRT changed it to a "female" one. But what does that even mean? I'm sure your emotional responses changed. But men can cry watching a movie and still be men, while women can be cold-blooded murderers without regret and still be women.

Has your sense of identity changed? Do you mean something inside you used to say male but now says female? If that were the case, why would you begin HRT in the first place? And why wouldn't HRT change the minds of cross-dressers and androgynes, thus transforming them into transitioning women?

What about your mind has changed!? And I'm sorry I don't know more about your story, but supposing you began making a social transition around the same time you started HRT, how can you know your mind changes don't just come from changing your life?

I've been on feminizing HRT for 9 months. It's easier to cry and I worry a little more about the sorrows of those around me. But in no way does that make me more "female" than I ever was.

And I say your libido CHANGES - not that it goes away. You are changed into having a woman's chemistry - eventually giving you a female libido. THAT hapened to me. I have NO male function - and yet men suddenly seen very interesting! When did that happen- about a year and a half after starting.

That is by no means an expected outcome. Feminizing HRT obviously decreases your libido, but its effects on your specific sexual preferences can't be predicted. Human sexuality is complex, and many things could be attributed to you now being interested in men (again, your lifestyle changes). Even if HRT does play a role in that, it won't necessarily do that to everyone.

Again, 9 months of HRT here. My libido dropped dramatically the first month of HRT, but has stayed consistent ever since, and is still quite high. I still pleasure myself at least once a day and often more. And my fantasies have not changed one bit.

Even if HRT were guaranteed to change your libido, I understand why that would deter people who want it for purely sexual reasons, but what about androgynes or anyone else who desires a different body for non-sexual reasons?

Fictional conversation with doctor:

"I want to grow boobs."

"Okay. I have something for that, but you may start being attracted to boys."

"Okay, but I still want boobs."

Twenty two months on HRT. I am NOT male anymore. I am certainly not androgynous. I cannot PASS as male anymore. It seems to me there is a certain urban legend a person CAN get on hormones and achieve certain results and not others.

I agree you can't control the effects but, again, just because you can't pass doesn't mean that will be the case for everyone. It would be AMAZING if it were. While you can't pass as male, others on HRT may never pass as anything BUT male.

I'm still seen as male. I'd have to try pretty hard to look female. I imagine if, in a year from now, I don't permanently remove my facial hair, I don't shave my legs, I don't shape my eyebrows, and I keep getting my haircut the same way, I'll still be pegged as male every time! Breasts and a big butt won't do it alone. Most people on HRT still have to make an effort to be female.

Honestly, if in a year from now, I am so female-looking that I can't go out as a male, then it'd be a dream come true. I look at it this way: my goal isn't to become a woman, it's to look more like a woman. If it goes so far that I start living life as one, well then horray! But if I don't quite get there, I still achieved my goal. I still look MORE like a woman already, whether or not I could pass as one. It's the same as making money. People are happy making money, but not everyone sets out to be rich.

In a way, saying only MTFs who plan to transition should be on HRT is like saying only people who intend on being rich should invest in the stock market.

I agree there are many wrong reasons to be on feminizing HRT, but planning to transition isn't the only right reason. It's fine if you think that, but I just don't follow your reasoning.

Link to comment
Honestly, if in a year from now, I am so female-looking that I can't go out as a male, then it'd be a dream come true. I look at it this way: my goal isn't to become a woman, it's to look more like a woman. If it goes so far that I start living life as one, well then horray! But if I don't quite get there, I still achieved my goal. I still look MORE like a woman already, whether or not I could pass as one

A whole lot of your post jive with me. So does this. I think I need to keep a similar mindset. I know I want to get on HRT so I should just try for that and see where it takes me. Obviously if I start it out and I don't like it I should stop but if I do like it, as I think I will, I should keep going. Then if I reach a point where a social transition becomes viable/needed I'll go for it, but I am not going to obsess over making every minute detail of my existence as feminine as possible.

Fictional conversation with doctor:

"I want to grow boobs."

"Okay. I have something for that, but you may start being attracted to boys."

"Okay, but I still want boobs."

Vastly simplified but this is kind of me. :lol:

Link to comment
  • 2 months later...
Guest Hydraxide

I wonder...

Suppose a male was to take a low level dose of an anti-androgen only. Not enough to bottom out the testosterone and cause the long term skeletal upset and other issues but enough to tone down the overt male attributes; reduction of libido a bit, slower hair growth, maybe some feminizing effects over the longer term etc.

Just putting it out there.

Link to comment
Guest Jo-I-Dunno

I wonder...

Suppose a male was to take a low level dose of an anti-androgen only. Not enough to bottom out the testosterone and cause the long term skeletal upset and other issues but enough to tone down the overt male attributes; reduction of libido a bit, slower hair growth, maybe some feminizing effects over the longer term etc.

Just putting it out there.

Hmm, good suggestion. All males have varying testosterone levels, and I imagine that correlates with physical "manliness". For example, I can't imagine someone like Orlando Bloom has the highest testosterone levels...

I remember my first blood tests when starting HRT had surprisingly low levels of testosterone (actually, after one month of HRT, my testosterone levels were HIGHER). And I generally considered myself a moderately pretty boy even before HRT.

But regular feminizing HRT takes a really long time; something like you're suggesting would take even longer. And spiro, for example, is not generally a very healthy thing. Taking it for the possibility of being vaguely prettier isn't something most doctors would allow.

And, as usual, I say the odds of growing huge unhideable boobs so quickly that you end up with something you don't want is pretty far-fetched. If you're willing to change your wardrobe around a little, it's practically a non-issue. But I am, as everyone is, skewed by personal experience. I've been on HRT for a year now. I still use a men's public shower no problem. But I'm still growing. I'm thinking this Summer I'll be wearing a wet suit when swimming, mostly because of my nipples though, not my vaguely protruding mounds of fat I might call boobs one day.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   9 Members, 0 Anonymous, 203 Guests (See full list)

    • MaryEllen
    • SamC
    • Mmindy
    • MaeBe
    • Ivy
    • Jordyn1215225
    • Ashley0616
    • Abigail Genevieve
    • Timber Wolf
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,029
    • Most Online
      8,356

    Selkimur
    Newest Member
    Selkimur
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Anyatimenow
      Anyatimenow
      (23 years old)
    2. Aria00
      Aria00
    3. Ava B.
      Ava B.
      (24 years old)
    4. Claire Heshi
      Claire Heshi
    5. CrystalMatthews0426
      CrystalMatthews0426
      (41 years old)
  • Posts

    • Mmindy
      Congratulations to the mom and family @Ivy on the addition of another child.   Hugs,   Mindy🌈🐛🏳️‍⚧️🦋
    • MaeBe
      Congrats to you and yours!
    • Ashley0616
      YAY! Congratulations on a granddaughter!
    • Ashley0616
      I recommend CarComplaints.com | Car Problems, Car Complaints, & Repair/Recall Information. A lot of good information
    • LucyF
      I've got Spironolactone ___mg and Evorel ___mcg Patches (2 a week) going up to ___mg after 4 weeks 
    • Ivy
      Got a new Granddaughter this morning.  Mother and child (and father) are doing fine. This makes 7 granddaughters and one grandson.  I have 2 sons and 6 daughters myself.  And then I  switched teams.  I think this stuff runs in the family. Another hard day for the patriarchy.
    • Ivy
      Like @MaeBe pointed out, Trump won't do these things personally.  I doubt that he actually gives a rat's a$$ himself.  But he is the foot in the door for the others.   I don't really see this.  Personally, I am all in favor of "traditional" families.  I raised my own kids this way and it can work fine.  But I think we need to allow for other variations as well.   One thing working against this now is how hard it is for a single breadwinner to support a family.  Many people (I know some) would prefer "traditional" if they could actually afford it.  Like I mentioned, we raised our family with this model, but we were always right at the poverty level.   I was a "conservative evangelical" for most of my life, actually.  So I do understand this.  Admittedly, I no longer consider myself one. I have family members still in this camp.  Some tolerate me, one actually rejects me.  I assure you the rejection is on her side, not mine.  But, I understand she believes what she is doing is right - 'sa pity though. I mean no insult toward anyone on this forum.  You're free to disagree with me.  Many people do.   This is a pretty complex one.  Socialism takes many forms, many of which we accept without even realizing it.  "Classism" does exist, for what it's worth.  Always has, probably always will.  But I don't feel like that is a subject for this forum.   As for the election, it's shaping up to be another one of those "hold your nose" deals.
    • Ivy
      Just some exerts regarding subjects of interest to me.
    • Ivy
      Yeah.  In my early teens I trained myself out of a few things that I now wish I hadn't.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I was thinking in particular of BLM, who years ago had a 'What We Believe' section that sounded like they were at war with the nuclear family.   I tried to find it. Nope.  Of interest https://www.politifact.com/article/2020/aug/28/ask-politifact-does-black-lives-matter-aim-destroy/   My time is limited and I will try to answer as I can.
    • Ivy
      Well, I suppose it is possible that they don't actually plan on doing what they say.  I'm not too sure I want to take that chance.  But I kinda expect to find out.  Yet, perhaps you're right and it's all just talk.  And anyway, my state GOP is giving me enough to worry about anyway. I remember a time when being "woke" just meant you were paying attention.  Now it means you are the antichrist. I just don't want the government "protecting" me from my personal "delusions."
    • MaeBe
      1.  I think there are some legitimate concern.   2. Thoroughly discussing this will consume many threads.   3. I disagree partially with @MaeBe but there is partial agreement.   4. The context includes what is happening in society that the authors are observing.  It is not an isolated document.   The observation is through a certain lens, because people do things differently doesn't mean they're doing it wrong. Honestly, a lot of the conservative rhetoric is morphing desires of people to be treated with respect and social equity to be tantamount to the absolution of the family, heterosexuality, etc. Also, being quiet and trying to blend in doesn't change anything. Show me a social change that benefits a minority or marginalized group that didn't need to be loud.   5. Trump, if elected, is as likely to spend his energies going after political opponents as he is to implementing something like this.   Trump will appoint people to do this, like Roger Severino (who was appointed before, who has a record of anti-LGBTQ+ actions), he need not do anything beyond this. His people are ready to push this agenda forward. While the conservative right rails about bureaucracy, they intend to weaponize it. There is no question. They don't want to simplify government, they simply want to fire everyone and bring in conservative "warriors" (their rhetoric). Does America survive 4 year cycles of purge/cronyism?   6. I reject critical theory, which is based on Marxism.  Marxism has never worked and never will.  Critical theory has problems which would need time to go into, which I do not have.   OK, but this seems like every other time CRT comes up with conservatives...completely out of the blue. I think it's reference is mostly just to spark outrage from the base. Definitely food thought for a different thread, though.   7. There are groups who have declared war on the nuclear family as problematically patriarchal, and a lot of other terms. They are easy to find on the internet.  This document is reacting to that (see #4 above).   What is the war on the nuclear family? I searched online and couldn't find much other than reasons why people aren't getting married as much or having kids (that wasn't a propaganda from Heritage or opinions pieces from the right that paint with really broad strokes). Easy things to see: the upward mobility and agency of women, the massive cost of rearing children, general negative attitudes about the future, male insecurity, etc. None of this equates to a war on the nuclear family, but I guess if you look at it as "men should be breadwinners and women must get married for financial support and extend the male family line (and to promote "National Greatness") I could see the decline of marriage as a sign of the collapse of a titled system and, if I was a beneficiary of that system or believe that to NOT be tilted, be aggrieved.   8.  Much of this would have to be legislated, and this is a policy documented.  Implementation would  be most likely different, but that does not mean criticism is unwarranted.   "It might be different if you just give it a chance", unlike all the other legislation that's out there targeting LGBTQ+ from the right, these are going to be different? First it will be trans rights, then it will be gay marriage, and then what? Women's suffrage?   I get it, we may have different compasses, but it's not hard to see that there's no place for queer people in the conservative worldview. There seems to be a consistent insistence that "America was and is no longer Great", as if the 1950s were the pinnacle of society, completely ignoring how great America still is and can continue to be--without having to regress society to the low standards of its patriarchal yesteryears.    
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      Cadillac parts are pretty expensive, so repairing them costs more.  But they don't seem to break down more than other makes.  Lots of Lincoln models use Ford cars as a base, so you can get parts that aren't much more expensive.    My family has had good luck with "Panther platform" cars.  Ford Crown Victoria, Mercury Marquis, Lincoln Towncar or Continental.  4.6 V8 and 5.0 V8.  Reasonable fuel economy, and fairly durable.  Our county sheriff's office was running Chargers and SUV's for a while, but has gone back to older Crown Victorias for ease of maintenance.  GF rebuilds them here.  But they are getting more scarce, since the newest ones were made in 2011.    1992-1997 years were different than the later years.  1998-2001 they did some changes, and apparently the best years are 2003 to 2011.  Check Craigslist, and also government auctions.  GF has gotten a lot of them at auction, and they can be had in rough-but-running shape for around $1,000.  Ones in great shape can be found in the $5,000+ range.  Good for 200,000 miles without significant rebuilding.  Go through engine and transmission and electrical systems, and they go half a million.    Some Chrysler models are OK.  The 300 mostly has the same engines as the Charger and Challenger, so parts availability is pretty good.  But they tend to get timing issues.  The older Chrysler Sebring convertibles were pretty reliable, sometimes going 200,000 miles without tons of problems, although after that they were pretty much worn out. 
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I think I have read everything the Southern Baptists have to say on transgender, and it helped convince me they are dead wrong on these issues.  They can be nice people.  I would never join an SBC church.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      You come across as a thoughtful, sweet, interesting and pleasant person.    There are parts of this country, and more so the world, where evangelicals experience a great deal of finger wagging.
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...