Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

what is the definition of intersex?


Makiducky

Recommended Posts

i want to learn more about this(mainly cause I think I might just be this) and most people have the concepts wrong, but I don't know if I count, my pretransition self was kinda standard, I had estrogen, periods, and afab genitalia, no beard all the package.  the problem here is that I did had an operation due to what doctors precieved as a malfromation, I don't have labia menora, and the labia majora was closed  when I was born. what does this mean?? note that I'm trans but have since transitioned to male(haven't had bottom surgery ) and I need to know for bottom surgery. also my pronouns are he/they and I'm gender faun.

Link to comment
  • Admin

None of us here on staff are medical experts and what you describe would take expert medical examination to give you a definitive answer. Some cis girls are born with a condition called Vaginal Agenesis where they do have uterus and ovaries, but the vagina is missing to connect it to the outside the body.  My mother was a Registered Nurse who let me read her Nursing School text books where I picked that up. Today it is known as a DSD (Differences of Sexual Development) which is a term for Intersex.  This condition is close to what you describe, but you need to ask your medical provider for the real diagnosis there.  As to what or how it could contribute to Gender Dysphoria, I have no idea.

Link to comment

Hi & welcome to the forums @Makiducky.

 

There's a condition called labial fusion or labial adhesion where the labia minora or majora are fused together. 

 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470461/

 

From what I briefly read, such a condition may or may not be construed as ambiguous genitalia. 

 

There's also a congenital condition called urogenital sinus (US) where the urethra and vaginal opening are malformed or fused, and this condition is sometimes concurrent with labial fusion. Apparently some cases of US are considered intersex conditions - it depends on how stuff is formed or fused.

 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10242390/

 

At any rate, like Vicky said, only a medical professional can truly ascertain your situation. Are you able to find out from your parent(s) or anyone else who was around when you were a baby? 

 

P. S. Genderfaun is a new term for me. I had to look it up. Thanks for the added knowledge.

Link to comment

to the extent I know what I had was a labial fusion,  that's what my parents told me, that's what I've been told to have, still to say that I was 100% afab doesn't seem a good option, since I'm missing the labia Minora, and since people who are 100% your standard afab body don't usually get operations unless trans/dysphoric, what I'm looking for is the word to describe someone  who doesn't really count as your standard intersex person(is it just me or I don't feel I am intersex enough?) but also doesn't have  a binary body, similar to anon-binary(someone like me, that feels nonbinary but not quite or not all the time),but for intersex people, again thanks everyone for your help, I really appreciate it.

Link to comment

I'm no medical expert, but intersex shows up in many different ways.  I'd say that if your labia were closed up or fused together originally, you're likely intersex.  You'd probably want to go to a doctor who specializes in gender issues, as what's on the inside might be more unique than what's on the outside.

 

I'm AFAB, and all my outside parts look and function as female, although labia and clitoris are overly large.  The fun stuff is actually on the inside, and was only found at the doctor.  A complete and working prostate, which what totally unexpected!  And a 2nd urethra branch, a ton of weird nerves.... In short, the plumbing is a mess.  I'd never be a candidate for surgery.  My unique anatomy manages to all function together (sort of), so changing anything would do more harm than good. 

 

Anyways, I'm just one example of how intersex can be.  You're likely unique. 

Link to comment

Like most gender diverse areas, Intersex is an evolving term. Different doctors will have different definitions, and this is changing as we learn more. Where is was mostly the physical structure of the reproductive system, it has broadened, and become less straightforward. The test for genetics is growing  more complicated (see the Video Sex and Sensibility 

) but this is just part of the debate. Definitions of Transgender had become challenging, so the major organisations backed away from it and have adopted incongruence or narrowed it to Gender Dysphoria, also leaving the debate happening. I guess each case needs to be assessed and treated individually, so I wouldn't worry too much about definitions while everything is still evolving!

 

Hugs,

 

Allie

Link to comment

I'll add that some folks who are intersex have atypical chromosomes, an unusual karyotype, possessing fewer or extra sex chromosomes.  For example, 47 XXY, or 45 X.  If you have unique chromosomes, it might be easier for a doctor to help you out.  Genetically, I'm a 46XX "true female" yet I have the interesting anatomy....my doctor was a bit surprised.  

 

You can get a DNA test if you want, and a doctor with experience in gender and sex issues can help you.  DNA testing and MRI scans are just a couple of things doctors can do to get more information about your specific physical setup.  And if you're looking at getting surgeries, these are likely to be prerequisites.

Link to comment
3 hours ago, Makiducky said:

what I'm looking for is the word to describe someone  who doesn't really count as your standard intersex person(is it just me or I don't feel I am intersex enough?) but also doesn't have  a binary body, similar to anon-binary(someone like me, that feels nonbinary but not quite or not all the time),but for intersex people.

 

FYI Mt. Sinai lists partial labial fusion as a "symptom" of intersex. This doesn't necessarily imply intersex. 

Screenshot_20231007-192604.thumb.png.0ff03c7a9c2598b86340602b12ae9dc4.png

https://www.mountsinai.org/health-library/diseases-conditions/intersex

 

However, Center for American Progress gives this definition of intersex.

Screenshot_20231007-193130.thumb.png.86204a964e63bd7a50d468c8ecb14723.png

https://www.americanprogress.org/article/key-issues-facing-people-intersex-traits/

 

To the extent intersex is an umbrella term referring to the diversity of sex traits, I'd say you may describe yourself as intersex if you prefer. I think any other "term" would really be some kind of description like sex nonbinary, sex diverse, or sex atypical, etc. 

 

I understand that with practically all umbrellas of diversity, there's the potential for not feeling (fill in the blank) enough. But, one must ask oneself if they really desire diversity to have cut marks - that idea rather defies the whole concept of diversity. Ultimately it's up to you and what you're comfortable with. It's no one else's business to determine how you describe/define/refine yourself. 

Link to comment
  • Admin

Although the medical profession is using the DSD nomenclature that I used up above, it is NOT in much daily conversation and would describe your needed surgical intervention for you as something a bit unique.

Link to comment

On my exterior I have an extra large clitoris instead of a penis, labial fusion, and testes. 

The crazy part is the interior where I have a uterus and fallopian tubes. 

Basically I am AMAB because I have testes instead of ovaries. 

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 63 Guests (See full list)

    • MaybeRob
    • VickySGV
    • Petra Jane
    • Betty K
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      79.8k
    • Total Posts
      756.6k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,518
    • Most Online
      8,356

    Val-Ma
    Newest Member
    Val-Ma
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. AnddyWillBeOkay
      AnddyWillBeOkay
    2. GrowinPains
      GrowinPains
      (47 years old)
    3. Joolz
      Joolz
    4. Kali Rose
      Kali Rose
      (47 years old)
    5. kris1987
      kris1987
  • Posts

    • VickySGV
      I just checked and see your problem and mine.  I copied the numbers off a page of the and picked up a figure I did not mean to.  26,673,525 is the total able to register statewide, and the 82.91% is the numbers that actually have registered.   22,114,456 is the total registered,   10,353,432  is the number of Democrats registered, (46.82%);  and Republicans come in at 5,286,269 (23.9%)   American Independent party 825,981 (3.74%)  Green Party 101,620 (0.46%)   Libertarians 242, 299 (1.10%)  No Party Preference 4,914,982 (22.23)  and a couple more categories that equaled about 1.5% of the real total.
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      @Jamielynn One factor in breast growth is body type and amount of body fat.  The modern western ideal of "slender but with large breasts" seems to be fairly unusual in nature.  The women in my life (just a sample) tend to follow the pattern of "slender = smaller breasts and thicker = larger breasts."     Yes, decrease testosterone and increase estrogen will yield secondary sex characteristics.  Within limitations.  Two of my friends are MtF, and both have HRT.  Even with HRT, neither has large breasts.... a full A-cup or small B-cup at most.  Both are fairly slender and physically active.  If they wanted something larger, they'd likely have to look at augmentation.
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      I do too.  Actually, husband's parents used to have FOX on the TV constantly in their home until a couple of years ago.  But viewers are decreasing overall as people cut the cord on expensive cable services.  Something is just unhealthy about consuming that much media, no matter the source.  Remember the days when "news" was something that came on for a half hour at 6pm?  Or arrived in a rolled-up paper on the driveway on Sunday and Wednesday?
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      OK, I'm confused.  I'm no scholar, but isn't a "whole" supposed to be 100%?  Yet 82% are Democrats and 46% are Republicans?  Unless I'm missing something, that's more than 100%.... are people double registered or something?   It seems like a lot of studies go for 1000 respondents.  I guess its just a nice, round number?  But for a state as big as CA, its a pretty small sample size.  And 1000 people from San Fransisco will give very different results than 1000 people from Northern CA smaller towns.  It would be interesting to know the polling locations they used, but I suspect that the study is basically worthless due to its sample size and limitations. 
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      Lots of folks have been feeling that way for quite a while, and for different reasons.  The trick is... become OK with that idea.    After all, the Founding Fathers were outlaws in the eyes of the British crown.  There's frequently a difference between "right" and "legal."  There's lots of things that are legal, but not right.  And lots of things that are right, but not legal.  According to Jefferson, "When injustice becomes law, resistance becomes duty."  The day the system makes me an outlaw, I'll be in good company. 
    • AllieJ
      Thank you EasyE!  I have been researching this for years and have lots of links, but just google transgender brain and you will see lots of information (some conflicting) but concentrate on Bed Nucleus. This area of the brain is structured to sense what is happening around you and send signals to the rest of the brain. It was originally only thought to control anxiety, and the fight or flight reflex, but it has been found to be sexually dimorphic in structure, and is likely the centre of gender identity. In this case (still being researched) the signals it sends to the rest of the brain would be dysphoria. (if/when they can prove this it should mean GI and Dysphoria are not mental.) There is no way to change the Bed Nucleus atm, so 'it isn't going away'!   You need to read a number of papers as each of them has parts of the story, and it is still being developed.   Hugs,   Allie 
    • MaeBe
      One of the reasons the far right is pushing so hard right now. The kids are alright, so time is short for instilling sweeping “conservative” and authoritarian dogma. 
    • EasyE
      I would love to know more about this. Do you have links where we can read more, Allie? I hear so many people (including myself) saying to folks around them "this isn't going to go away" (even though others don't understand this) ... I feel that too. It would be nice to know a little more why. Thanks!!! And thanks for all you do to keep us so well informed!
    • EasyE
      Welcome! Thanks for sharing! This truly is a safe and judgement-free space... 
    • EasyE
      Here's one more Willow. Happy B-Day!! Hope you have had a blessed day!! And a blessed year ahead!! 
    • emeraldmountain2
      2%, even better! That is over 6.7 million Americans and over 160.2 million people worldwide who are trans. No small numbers! We are everywhere.
    • AllieJ
      There hasn't been any accurate census of the trans population, and it would be difficult given the varieties under the trans umbrella. Governments grossly under represent trans numbers so they don't have to provide funding, but in countries where trans people are traditionally accepted the populations are usually estimated around 2%. This is almost all represented by trans feminine people, and doesn't include non binary. As most trans people either haven't figured out they are trans, or are in hiding, accurate numbers are likely never to be known. About 5% of youth in the US have claimed to be gender diverse, and I have read papers which forecast between 5 and 8% of the worlds population could be gender diverse.    I feel most comfortable with the 2% number as a minimum of people who will take some affirming action, but do feel the total number would be much higher.   Hugs,   Allie
    • Vidanjali
      What an amazing story, @EmilyLouise48. You are blessed to have that support on your life. Thank you for sharing. 
    • emeraldmountain2
      1% sounds small, but it's significant. One study estimates the number trans and nonbinary Americans at 1.6%, which is over 5 million people! We are numerous, we are everywhere, and we are strong.
    • Vidanjali
      You might consider wearing a wide cloth headband or turban headband to feminize your look while your brushed back hair grows out. You can find lots of different patterns like these for example.
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...