Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Post Op Sexuality


Carolyn Marie

Recommended Posts

Guest BeckyTG

This thread is prompted by my completion of the fourth TS autobiography I've read. Some were written long ago, others more recently.

One thing they all share is a description of post operative behavior that I euphemistically describe as "risk-taking," but could also be

described as jumping the bones of anyone within reach. :o

Yeah, so anyway, what I'm trying to figure out, is if these Transwomen ... are aberrations, or if you have found in your discussions with others, or in your own experiences, that this kind of behavior is typical.

...

I don't expect anyone to talk openly about their own experiences. But if you can couch it in ways that protect the innocent, I would really

like to know what the real world is like. Please remember, this is PG 13. Thanks

Carolyn Marie

Carolyn,

I can tell you, as one who lived through the late 60s and early 70s, that it was a time of "free love" and promiscuity was common then. Whatever you read that was set in that time frame would likely reflect that.

Regarding other books you've read, I don't know that you can really draw a parallel between the accounts of encounters in those books and the behavior of the general population. I know a number of post-ops and I don't see anything about them that would mark them as any different than the rest of the people, from a standpoint of sex.

I would expect that the experience of sex would itself be a powerful attraction to a new woman. I have not considered sex as a woman much and my therapist is leading me in that direction, to prepare me for the future. I was surprised when she suggested that, but I count on her for guidance and learning.

Sex as a female is something that a pre-op trans woman may not know much about, since our medical regimen pretty much puts a damper on what we knew and often removes any further desires. I can readily see where changing the workings and removing the obstacles to desires now set up some interesting new dilemmas. OK, now we experience desires again, how do we go about satisfying them? Our formerly known method is no longer operational, what do we do now? Being ill prepared strikes me as a little risky and might even lead to a depression of sorts.

One thing that I must warn all of us to guard against and that is our total preoccupation with the transition itself. The events and changes that lead up to SRS are only part of our lives. We still have all the rest of the things that trouble most people, we just sometimes too easily overlook them or stuff them in the closet where we used to be ourselves.

If you really want to know if this behavior in the first few years post-op is normal, I suggest you study young post-pubescent adolescent girls and see how soon they become sexually active themselves. I'd bet you may find the actions to be similar as I can make a case for the situation being similar.

I'll further wager that you'll find their behavior to be all over the map, just as I believe you'll find the behavior of post-ops. If you further break down this behavior as to socio-economic and educational status, I think you'll find some parallels there, as well.

Interesting study in Sociology, eh?

Becky

Link to comment
Guest Donna Jean

.

I just want to interject something here....

I'm 60 now and I'll be getting my SRS in my 60's.....

At this point in time, I'm not really interested in "taking it out for a spin" when the time comes...

I once owned a Porsche and the speedometer went to 200....but I never felt that I had to take it up that fast...

My number one goal is to be as physically complete as possible...

Casual sex? Sleeping around?...lol...I'm way past that...

I can't really say how I'll act post surgery and I appreciate all of the input from the post-op girls here..

I belong to another group that is specifically for elder TG's.. (dang, that would include me, I guess...) and many there have gotten their SRS in their 40's through 70...A number of them are long time married to their original spouse (ie...2 women together) and none have ever said that the wanted to go out and find a man after SRS...they just wanted that phase of their transition done...(the SRS).

So, I guess that I'm saying that we all have different goals and expectations out of this journey...

One size does not fit all...YMMV...we all want different things out of life....

There are no owners manuals....

Good luck....

Huggs

Donna Jean

Link to comment
Guest ChloëC

Drea,

I read both books I mentioned near when they came out back in the 70's and I was searching for something in writing, other than Benjamin's book which was far too technical, for something to hang on to. For the large part of both books, I felt very positive, because the two women seemed to be writing about their pre and post op and transitioning experiences and feelings and what it all meant, like in a larger sense and a personal sense.

Then the whole tone and tenor (ie the drift of something spoken or written) changed and it was very unsettling and a little off putting. I also read Jan Morris 'Conundrum' at about the same time, and it was consistent throughout.

I am not saying that anyone can't do what they want. I'm certainly no prude here. I say, go for it, if that's what you want, and considering the situation, at one time, I thought of that as a very distinct possibility. That's fine, but when the focus changes abruptly like it did in both books, considering these weren't moment by moment writings, but totally from a post-op perspective,like somehow that's a conclusion to a life changing experience, that was never mentioned or intimated, or in the case of Nancy Hunt, practically denied, just made it less than uplifting.

As I have written before here, it took seeing one of the final shows of the old 'Lou Gordon' show after he died unexpectedly and his wife tried to take over, where she had a number of post-op mtf's on who were trying to live normal lives and seemed very uncomfortable to be in any spotlight, that I found role-models that I could appreciate and imagine myself as.

Canary and Nancy came close, but they weren't quite there. Remember you have to put yourself into 1975, when there was no internet, no support groups, no Laura's, no real concept of gender therapists, and being tg was very much considered being a freak. I needed to know that there might be some kind of normalacy and stories they told just missed.

Hugs

Chloë

Link to comment
Guest Cynthia Of Creation

I will say, Carolyn, that those sections of Canary and Mirror Images put me off a little when I read them. I mean, I'm no prude, and in my imagination, if I went through transition, I knew I would want to find out, but, the way these two women wrote about it, I just wonder how absolutely true it was, and how much was added (or enhanced) for 'shock' value to try to make the book a seller.

They say sex sells, and I would guess in the 1970's when morals were supposedly a little looser, that the publishers may have thought there might be a sort of voyeur sub-market for these stories, since they may have felt the mainstream might not be there (yet).

I think it was Mirror Images where the author spent two or three chapters talking quite strongly about protecting her virginity, then the next chapter, she 'happily' (and way too quickly) lost it to almost some stranger.

And isn't it in Canary where she wound up having to work at a mail-order adult toy place and the owner or manager put some moves on her and she succombed? It just made the story a little less, oh, liberating, I guess.

I mean in 1970's USA, for a teen/early 20's potential mtf, the choices were drag queen, female impersonator, odd media star, or jumping into bed with almost the first male that showed interest. Not exactly ideal choices. Maybe that's why I chose the road I did.

Hugs

Chloë

I think it lost some realism when in that biography the owner pulled of his mask and revealed he was really a marshan, im suprised that really happened.

But to awnswer the question, curiosity ya, i know ill be curious but i will not go out and have sex. nope im waiten till im maried

Link to comment

But to awnswer the question, curiosity ya, i know ill be curious but i will not go out and have sex. nope im waiten till im maried

Really? o.O why? Sex is fun...

Don't force yourself to get married because you are sexually arroused lol.

Link to comment
Guest Cynthia Of Creation

Really? o.O why? Sex is fun...

Don't force yourself to get married because you are sexually arroused lol.

Hugh NO!

Im getting married because I love the person. if that plan works out i can not say but i doubt i will have trouble sticking to it.

well if its fun it will be worth the wait.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   7 Members, 0 Anonymous, 181 Guests (See full list)

    • KatieSC
    • FinnyFinsterHH
    • KathyLauren
    • Abigail Genevieve
    • Ivy
    • Ashley0616
    • awkward-yet-sweet
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.7k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,033
    • Most Online
      8,356

    ArtavikenGenderflui
    Newest Member
    ArtavikenGenderflui
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. afraid of self
      afraid of self
    2. Chaidoesart
      Chaidoesart
      (14 years old)
    3. Faith57
      Faith57
    4. Joyce Ann
      Joyce Ann
      (70 years old)
    5. Kelly21121
      Kelly21121
      (56 years old)
  • Posts

    • Abigail Genevieve
      I don't think it should be.  Nor do I see Project 2025 as pushing Christian nationalism.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      The agencies are supposed to work for him.  The problem, as conservatives found out in Trump 1, was they will ignore the president and do their own thing.  The agencies are supposed to be under his control.   Congress delegated some of its law making authority to the agencies, which is another problem.   The bloated federal government needs to be trimmed.  Dept Education is worthless - test scores have dropped since it was instituted in the Carter administration consistently, and it is currently implementing Biden's woke agenda more than doing anything else.
    • FinnyFinsterHH
      I hope to eventually wear a suit for dance but don't know what exactly to look for. I feel like jumpsuit is safe option but I have been interested in wearing button up and formal pants. Is there a certain brand i should look for or sites I should look at for tips? My mom is not exactly keen on me wearing too masc clothing like suits just yet but is okay with jumpsuits. Also is there hair styling tips availible, my hair looks like image below. I might be able to get shorter haircut like pixie but am not sure yet.  
    • MaeBe
      It’s never been about him, but he is the Presidential nominee for the Presidency that starts in…2025. I don’t see a lot of conflation that this is a “Trump doctrine”, it a doctrine that benefits him surely, but it is a plan to instill crony governance and enact very Christian conservative (if not purely Christian nationalist) “order” on the country. If you don’t see this as the Right doubling down on Big G government, I don’t know what to tell them. Getting rid of agencies and giving the authority directly to the Executive isn’t shrinking government. It’s consolidation power. 
    • MaeBe
      It is the made up ideology they believe trans people are pushing on the world, those “poor young girls who are being coerced into believing they are men” and the “perverts who put on dresses and think they’re girls”. The anti-LGBTQ+ movement came up with the term. Being trans = you believe in trans ideology/transgenderism, supporting trans people = the same.   In the end anyone that acts on or thinks gender is anything but what is in your pants is a “transgenderist”, why not make it a word if it’s not, there is no real grey area. Unless you acknowledge there is transgenderism, but use your knowledge to “correct it”.  So I guess there could be transgenderist conversion “therapists”.  Face it, we deface the America they want. Land of the Free and Home of the Brave? I think being out and queer is pretty brave. And freedom shouldn’t just be for those who push a narrow “Christian ideology” as the “true” governing model.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Over here muttering about "a new Jim Crow against a persecuted minority."    
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Rants are not a problem.  My favorite hobby! :)   What's out there is bad enough that I wonder why some people feel they need to embellish it.  Be alert.   Some of this will need to be fought in court if they try to implement it. If people are out to get me, paranoia is justified.  And this may not be the only document.   Abby
    • Ivy
      Not in so many words, therefore it's not there at all.  Excuse my paranoia. And the states passing laws against us are nothing to worry about either. Having to change my gender back to male (like in Florida) is reasonable.  I should just accept it, I mean I was born with a dk.  So that "F" is lie, and a fraud.  My delusions need to be dealt with for my own good.   I'm just frustrated these days.  Just a bit of a rant.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      You probably remember the Target PR fiasco.  I remember reading an account from a woman who shopped there.  She went into a stall and did her business, and someone came into the bathroom and began swinging stall doors open, and when she came to her stall, the woman peeked at her through the crack. "What are you doing?" "Checking for perverts." The writer was so stunned by the absurdity that she finished up ASAP and got out of there, while the other woman entered a stall and locked it, made sure it was locked, and locked it again. 
    • Adrianna Danielle
      Been a good day.Cleaned my closet of clothes that I do not wear anymore and do not fit me.It looks better now.Came down to my newest property beside mine,owner passed and I inherited it.There was a double wide there that was removed,it was in bad shape.It is the shop part I am keeping which I got the tools,shop equipment,benches,hoists and shelving too.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Nothing about eradicating TG folk. 
    • Ivy
      If 9 out of 10 parts are ok, that doesn't mean I need to accept the bad parts (that are aimed directly at me).  That seems suicidal.
    • Ivy
      True, most of it has nothing to do directly with us.  It's the parts that do that are the problem.   I see the  few problematic statements as being a big problem.  Just because a lot of it may be okay, doesn't change that. Even supposing the rest of it might be good for the country, it doesn't help me if I'm being "eradicated".  I suppose I should be good with that, because it's for the "greater good".  If me being gone would please a number of people, then it's my civic duty to disappear, and vote to implement that.
    • Ivy
      Yeah.  There are already laws against assault.  I don't think the overwhelming majority of trans women have any desire to harass cis women.  Speaking for myself, if I go into a women's washroom, it's because my eyeballs are already floating - not for kicks.  And I worry about getting clocked and assaulted by some guy being a "hero."
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Only three, maybe four, sections even mention transgender.  Most is a conservative agenda I have no problem with.   In the sections that mention transgender, there are very few lines.  Those lines ARE problematic, in every case. Unequivocally.  I can't see some of them standing up in court.  In one case a recommended policy goes against a court decision, which strongly suggests the implementation of that policy would be stopped in court.    Anyone maintaining that this is written simply to support Trump, to support him becoming a dictator, to crush transgender people is feeding you a line.  Nor is it an attempt to erase transgender people.   People will have to decide if the overall goals are worth the few problematic statements.  Overall, I support it.  Of course, I have some reservations.
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...